Answer:
23 thousandths. <em><u>=</u></em><em><u> </u></em> 23 ÷ 10^3
9+4 × (6÷3) <em><u>></u></em> (9+4×6) ÷ 3
5 tens + 2 hundredths. <em><u><</u></em> 50.20
810.6 ÷ 10. <em><u>=</u></em> 8.106 × 10
Are there any answers to choose from?
So if Jack was 10 years older than Priscilla and their ages combined equals to 170. I believe Priscilla is 80 and Jack was 90 cause 90+80=170
Answer:
a) False
b) True
Step-by-step explanation:
a) h(1) = 0/0, which is certainly undefined. There may or may not be a finite limit at that point, so the line x=1 is not necessarily a vertical asymptote.
The assertion that x=1 is necessarily a vertical asymptote is False.
__
b) h(2) = 4/0, another undefined value. However, we can be certain that the limit of h(x) as x → 2 is infinite, meaning the line x=2 will be a vertical asymptote.
The assertion that x=2 is necessarily a vertical asymptote is True.
_____
The graph shows a simple example of a function that has the given characteristics.
We can solve
this problem by first calculating the annual net cash inflow. This can be
solved by remembering that:
Payback period
= Initial investment<span> / Annual net
cash inflow</span>
<span>
6 years = $75,000
/ Annual net
cash inflow
<span>
Therefore,
Annual net
cash inflow = $12,500
Next, we
calculate for the cost. The cost we will consider here is the depreciation
value of the machine.
Annual depreciation
= $75,000 / 15 years = $5,000
Therefore the annual net operating income is:
Annual net operating income = $12,500 - $5,000 = $7,500
Simple rate of
return is calculated by:
Simple rate of
return = Annual net operating income / Initial
investment
Simple rate of
return = $7,500 / <span>
$75,000 = 0.1 = 10%</span></span></span>
