Answer:
during the versailles meeting every participant come with their motives for example woodrow want to divide balkan region to the power of influence which was among of his 14 points simply the big three were looking for golden chance for brightening their economy.
but due to the resolution passed including some colonies to be free such as lithuans and punishment to the germany and his Alli the treaty ending to be the causatives of the second crisis(WW2)
But if the 14 points would used it would have been used as the only way to put the world safe from what happened in 1939
Monopoly can increase a corporation s profits of the corporation by applying a policy of price discrimination. Price discrimination is the sale of the same product to different buyers at different prices. By applying price discrimination, the monopoly increases the price above the equilibrium level or increases the volume of sales, due to which the profit increases. Examples of this policy are the sale of the monopoly of their products by separate batches; At the same time, it sells the first batch at a higher price than the subsequent.
Brezhnev was much keener to protect the priviledges of the Nomemclature than reforming the country. Khrushchev had reformed the Soviet Union because he wanted it to have a better image abroad. He was destituted by the Nomemclature who feared about their priviledges and blamed him for failing in Cuba in his foreign policy.
They produced different materials and crops.
The correct answer is: "it violates the right to privacy".
The USA PATRIOT Act was enacted in 2001 as a reponse to the September 11 attacks and signed by President George Bush. The name of this act is actually an acronym which stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001"
The Patriot Act in its Tittle II confers increased powers to surveillance agencies and bodies dependent of the federal government. Its promoters argued it was a necessary measure to suceed on the war against terrorism. On the other hand, its detractors claimed that these provisions went against individual freedoms and basic civic rights.
