1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
spayn [35]
3 years ago
14

Which statement best explains why tension grew between European leaders over colonialism in africa

History
2 answers:
Arturiano [62]3 years ago
8 0
Where are the answers to choose from?
Flura [38]3 years ago
6 0

Some were angered because other nations took over their colonies.


You might be interested in
How Christianity helped to unify the Byzantine empire
FromTheMoon [43]

Byzantine Emperor Alexius did not have enough power to go against the Seljuk Turks who had settled outside the gates of Byzantium, so he invited Christian rulers in the west to join forces against a common Islamic enemy.  So, in addition to that Seljuk Turks were Muslims.

This will prove to be one of the most significant (and by Byzantium as one of the most disastrous) decisions in the history of the Empire, the Christian world and the history of relations between Christians and Muslims.

Roman Pope Urban used this invitation to help end the centuries-old aspirations of Roman Catholic leaders to annex the Byzantine Church to the Roman Catholic subjugation. Therefore, in 1095, at the council in Clermont, he called on the entire Western Christian world to take up arms under the sign of the cross and to embark on a campaign to retake Jerusalem from the hands of the unbelievers. This was followed by an incredible and unexpectedly massive response from warriors from all parts of the western countries from the Mediterranean to the North Sea, and one of the points on their journey was Constantinople.

Explanation:

  • The Byzantine emperor Alexius expected help in the form of a smaller number of mercenary units from the west and was completely unprepared for a huge and undisciplined army of armed savages who soon arrived in the Byzantine territories.
  • Most of the leaders from the west were Normans, and Emperor Alexius allowed them to pass through Constantinople only on the condition that they swear that all the liberated territories would belong to Byzantium.
  • The Norman promises to Byzantium were quickly broken as soon as the first unbelieving territories and cities were conquered, including Antioch, which was adopted as a feud by the Norman Bohemund, son of the famous Norman conqueror Robert, proclaiming himself the Prince of Antioch.

Learn more on Seljuk Turks on

brainly.com/question/5340864

brainly.com/question/1909114

#learnwithBrainly

6 0
3 years ago
How might prussian poles have viewed german nationalism
professor190 [17]

Answer:

Explanation: For Russification in Partitioned Poland, see Russification of Poles during the Partitions. For Germanization in Poland during World War II, see Germanisation in Poland (1939–1945).

After partitioning Poland at the end of the 18th century, the Kingdom of Prussia and later the German Empire imposed a number of Germanization policies and measures in the newly gained territories, aimed at limiting the Polish ethnic presence and culture in these areas. This process continued through its various stages until the end of World War I, when most of the territories became part of the Second Polish Republic, which largely limited the capacity of further Germanisation efforts of the Weimar Republic until the later Nazi occupation. The genocidal policies of Nazi-Germany against ethnic Poles between 1939 and 1945 can be understood as a continuation of previous Germanization processes.

3 0
2 years ago
When cases cannot be decided by statute, judges rely on
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

?

Explanation:

?

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELPPPPPPP
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

google

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did President Reagan’s views on government differ from President Johnson’s?
denis-greek [22]

Answer:

The answer is below:

Explanation:

President Lyndon Johnson, who was the United States President between 1963 to 1969, following the resignation of J.F. Kennedy, believed the government should provide social and general welfare reforms that benefit the overall citizens.

In contrast, President Ronald Reagan, who was the United States President between 1981 to 1989, believed that the government should cut spending on social reforms and stay away from businesses but increase spending on military capabilities.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following advantages helped chandragupta maurya unite India
    8·1 answer
  • In the Marxist, view what has been the course of history? What was the state of politics when the manifesto was composed?
    13·1 answer
  • The policy instituted by the Soviet leader, Gorbachev called ____________, which means openness, contributed to the collapse of
    10·2 answers
  • In the same article, in the section, “rush of sales increases”, the stock market crash of 1929 took place approximately how long
    10·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with my last post please?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the name of the Vice President of the United States? *
    8·2 answers
  • On the back of your answer sheet explain which innovative idea had the biggest impact on how people lived.
    5·1 answer
  • The graph shows the number of representatives that Georgia voters have sent to Congress in selected years.
    10·2 answers
  • According to the South, how did the Tariff of 1828 benefit the North?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the main function of veterinary Doctor​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!