Answer:
Explanation:
If you just talk about the 1960s there really was only one effective way and that was non violent civil disobedience. And the most effective gender were women. Rosa Parks became a leader because "the time was right." By that time, many of the colored "were part of the family." The most effective blows were cast against the middle class and the lower middle class who needed or wanted the colored as servants, as paid companions, as laborers such as gardeners. So when the "uprising" came, the whites were not threatened; they were inconvenienced more than anything. Rosa Parks didn't really disobey her orders nor her place in life. She just bent the rules a bit. She walked to work for one thing. Many of the colored choose that way. Just boycott the buses. It meant that the city of Birmingham, for example, lost a lot of money because they had to run empty buses.
Voting didn't show itself to be as effective as civil disobedience. Yes the colored had the vote. They even had guarantees that came with the vote. In 100 years the vote had really done them no good. There were laws that were created that got them nothing with the vote.
Violence was met with violence. Violence was there for people that had no patience. See anything to do with the Klan. The KKK was not easily intimidated.
So if non violence was so effective, why was it not tried before? I don't know about you, but I can just imagine what would have happened had the slaves tried it before the civil war. They would have had the skin whipped off their backs. After the civil war was no better -- in fact a lot worse. There were many ex-slaves and too few jobs. The "gentry" could pay what they liked for the jobs they needed doing by untrained uneducated labor.
Answer:
The cause of the Mexican Revolution was the 1910 election. This was a catalyst for the outbreak of political rebellion. The revolution was begun by elements of the Mexican elite hostile to Díaz, led by Madero and Pancho Villa. The Mexican people wanted their land back, Diaz made many improvements, but they were all detrimental to the poor.
US involvement with their revolution raises many questions because we were neglectful to aid the revolutionaries(the common and poor people) because Diaz was financially important to America's economy.
Answer:
C)by showing that when blood lineage failed, chaos and war followed
Explanation:
The War of Spanish Succession illustrates the importance of blood lineage to the system of absolute monarchs in Europe "by showing that when blood lineage failed, chaos and war followed."
This is evident when following the death of Charles II, King of Spain, without having any children or apparent heir in 1700. However, he formally let Louis XIV's grandson, Philip, a Bourbon to become the King of Spain. This upset the power balance, and a great fight ensued especially from the family of Habsburg. The war was so great it reached America, West Indies, and the Indian subcontinent.
The war finally ended after the treaty of Utrecht was made in 1713
