1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bezimeni [28]
3 years ago
13

Match each of the following laws with the effect it had on Native Americans.

History
2 answers:
Alik [6]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

See Explanation

Explanation:

Dawes Act - The government would not allow tribes to hold property communally

Curtis Act - The government dissolved tribal governments.

Springer Amendment - Tribes lost their claim to the Unassigned Lands

Hope this helps

mezya [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<u>Dawes Act: </u>The government would not allow tribes to hold property communally.

<u>Curtis Act:</u> The government dissolved tribal governments.

<u>Springer Amendment: </u>Tribes lost their claim to the Unassigned Lands.

Explanation:

The Dawes Act was passed in 1887. This law considered Native Americans as individuals, rather than members of tribes. Because of this, the government did not allow the tribes to hold property communally. The Curtis Act was an amendment to the Dawes Act. It dissolved tribal governments and led to the break-up of communal lands. Finally, the Springer Amendment led to the placing of <em>Unassigned Lands of Indian Territory</em> within the federal public domain.

You might be interested in
The Vietnam War considered a “success” of Containment theory.<br> A) True<br> B) False
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

False it wad not " sucess"

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a significant achievement of operah Winfrey
elena55 [62]
She was a billionaire and a star for America
5 0
3 years ago
What methods did Truman suggest for providing support to Greece and<br> Turkey?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

<h2><u><em>Truman Doctrine</em></u></h2>

Explanation:

<h2>pl<u><em>ease mark me brainliest</em></u></h2>
4 0
2 years ago
A timeline?
AysviL [449]

<u>ANSWER:</u>

I think that the answer would be #3.

<u>EXPLANATION: </u>

I think this because a timeline shows the events in order in time.

<u>HOPE THIS HELPS!   :D</u>

6 0
4 years ago
What decision did the Supreme Court reach in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
loris [4]

Answer:

There have been many decisions in the history of the US Supreme Court that are hard to call democratic. In the British North American colonies, and then in the USA, the legal foundations of the institution of slavery were created. The English legal system ruled out slavery, but gradually in the local laws of the colonies, and later in the Constitution of the United States and in the case-law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the grounds were formulated on which slaves were considered not to be human subjects, but property. This practice has led to the fact that, shortly before the Civil War, a racist attitude was legalized not only towards slaves, but also to the entire black population of the United States, as is clearly seen in the case of Dread Scott v. Sandford.

Dread Scott was a slave whose owner John Emerson took him from Missouri, the state where slavery was allowed, to Illinois, where slavery was prohibited. A few years later, Scott returned to Missouri with Emerson. Scott believed that since he lived in a free state, he should no longer be considered a slave.

Emerson died in 1843, and three years later, Scott sued Emerson's widow, demanding his freedom. In 1850, he won the case in one of the Missouri courts, but in 1852, the state supreme court overturned the lower court. Meanwhile, Ms. Emerson remarried, and Scott became the legal property of her brother John Sanford. Scott sued Sanford to regain his freedom. The case was investigated in one of the federal courts, which in 1854 ruled against Sanford.

When this case was referred to the Supreme Court, its members decided that Scott did not become free by virtue of his living in a free state and that, being a black man, he is not a citizen and, therefore, has no right to file a lawsuit with a court in force according to the norms of general and statutory law. This decision was widely criticized and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

The judgment in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was declared unconstitutional by the thirteenth constitutional amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865, and the fourteenth amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves in 1868.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was Alexander the Great important to the Israelites? A. He exposed Jews to Greek language and culture B. He conquered Judah
    12·2 answers
  • What economic activity was the thread that intertwined Americans in the 5 points
    13·1 answer
  • Why were the people in Germany upset after world war 1
    15·1 answer
  • How were European rulers guided by Enlightenment thoughts
    11·1 answer
  • What are 3 political causes of ww1
    12·2 answers
  • Which best defines a service?
    6·2 answers
  • What Jewish beliefs are shared by Christian's and muslims?
    11·1 answer
  • Calvinism was based on the ideas of
    10·1 answer
  • The United Nations was the first multinational institution to govern FDI beginning in the 1930s. True False
    5·1 answer
  • How did Mesopatamnia's fertile soil affect the growth of civilizations in the area?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!