1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
malfutka [58]
2 years ago
12

Historians label an event as a turning point when it

History
2 answers:
Nezavi [6.7K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Historians label an event as a turning point when it marks the beginning of a distant historical period.

Explanation:

In history, turning points are those events that mark a sharp change in the order of the events of a given process. That is, they are moments that change the established order, and are great causes of the subsequent end of the historical process in which they are immersed.

A clear example of turning point is the attack on Pearl Harbor, which meant the entry of the United States into World War II, which ultimately meant the defeat of the Axis in 1945.

Anit [1.1K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Marks the beginning of a distant historical period

Explanation:

You might be interested in
China was able to trade more than ever during the postclassical era because:
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

I am right!! I took the test with my friend we got it right.

8 0
2 years ago
What was the name of the alliance which included the soviet union and its satellites?
SOVA2 [1]
It was called the Warsaw Pact.
4 0
3 years ago
The South opposed the election of a Republican because the South thought they
Lena [83]
Would take away their slaves
7 0
2 years ago
which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid? a. confirming that it is not an online
nekit [7.7K]

<u>"confirming that it is not an online source" </u>is wrong. The problem is not the fact the source is online, but if it's credible.

<u>"determining whether or not it is well-known" </u>well-known sources might still be wrong. Being known does not make something true.

<u>"d. determining whether it is a secondary source" </u>again, it has nothing at all to do with the validity of the source.

So the answer is:

b. checking its conclusions against other sources

The best way is to check the source and compare to different ones that talk about the same subject. Comparing different conclusions of different authors and seeing different points of view about the same thing is often the best way.



6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. Why do Konovolov and the other officer come to blows?
Alex73 [517]

Answer:

begin fighting : to begin hitting each other They almost came to blows during their argument.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What contributed to the rise of the kingdom of Kongo?
    5·2 answers
  • A woman is accused of a crime. She says that she was nowhere near the scene of the crime. Her friends who were with her at the t
    10·1 answer
  • Maya civilization: <br><br> WRITTING <br><br> What was their writing system like?
    12·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, both “old” and “new” immigrants to the united states faced hostility because of
    10·2 answers
  • For centuries, North Africa has been linked to other lands by the Mediterranean Sea?
    13·2 answers
  • Plssss Help!!!
    13·2 answers
  • If you know the lengths of opposid sides of a quadrilateral can you tell if its a paralleogram
    10·1 answer
  • What was a Joint Stock Colony and what was its main goal?
    14·2 answers
  • Please help!
    7·1 answer
  • Who helped the colonists defeat the British at the Battle of Yorktown?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!