1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka [77]
3 years ago
14

What was the U.S. military goal in the Pacific?

History
1 answer:
malfutka [58]3 years ago
8 0
They had to defeat the japanese military
You might be interested in
How much material did it take to build the great pyramid?
Dahasolnce [82]
The Great Pyramid is composed of 2.3 million stones weighting nearly 3 tons each for a total mass of 6.5 million tons.
5 0
3 years ago
Historians attempt to answer the
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
Historians attempt to answer the history and what could have happened differently in life
4 0
2 years ago
In the nation’s history, presidents have used military force _____.
AlladinOne [14]
If it's about US, the answer is: In the nation’s history, presidents have used military force t<span>o have supreme</span>.
3 0
2 years ago
The first (and so far only) president to assume office as a result of the his appointment as vice-president under the twenty-fif
9966 [12]

The first person to be appointed to the vice-presidency under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to the Constitution (and the first to become president after the appointment) was?


Select one:

a. Answer: (Gerald Ford.).

b. Richard Nixon.

c. Nelson Rockefeller.

d. Harry Truman.

e. Spiro Agnew.



Reason: The 25th. Amendments first use came in October 1973, When President Richard Nixon nominated Gerald Rudolph Ford to replace Spiro Agnew just two days after Agnew's resignation as Vice President. Part of the push to get Ford approved was related to an expanded constitutional role granted to the Vice President under the 25th. Amendment in cases, where the President was unable to serve temporarily, or permanently.





Hope that helps!!!! :) Have a great day!!!!

5 0
3 years ago
The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile
Alex777 [14]

Answer:  E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the five power treaty, signed between the U.S., Great Britain, Japan , France, and Italy at the Washington naval confer
    12·1 answer
  • In the 1840s, iron ore was discovered in Michigan and Minnesota. However, the largest steelworks were in Pennsylvania, too far a
    8·1 answer
  • Pleaseee help
    15·1 answer
  • By 1770, there was a group of American composers with enough in common to be considered a "school." The leader of this school wa
    7·1 answer
  • Stalin was the soviet leader who built the berlin wall. <br> a. true <br> b. false
    11·1 answer
  • Why were farmers having a hard time in the<br> Midwest during Westward Expansion?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the result of the Chinese civil war that ended in 1949?
    7·1 answer
  • Choose all of the statements that describe Ellis Island.
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following events started the Red Scare?
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLS!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!