The question is missing two important elements. The question: "Where do you stand on this issue?" and Why?
The question also invites us to watch a video for further reference. It is a TV News Show that interviews a lawyer, expert in the subject of marriage and divorce.
What the lawyer basically says is that the law states that the give is good only if it meets the condition of marriage. This means that it is the property of the other person meanwhile people are married. In my opinion, the ring should be a symbol of commitment, not as expensive as it has become due to marketing and advertising. If it is a commitment and things do not result, then, the ring loses its true value and should be returned.
I think the best way to overcome imagined risks is to just
go with it. At best, you should focus on the benefits of what you are about to
do. Thinking of the risks would only
make you hesitate. If it is worth it,
then go for it.
The answer is post hoc. This is a logical fallacy that states "after this, therefore because of this." This fallacy is used when one is coming to a conclusion based on an order of events rather than using other factors that might lead to other interpretations.
Confucianism is an ethic of moral uprightness, social order, and filial responsibility. And Legalism is a theory of autocratic, centralized rule and harsh penalties.
Hello~
The Spanish leader who was responsible for conquering Montezuma's empire was: <span>Hernán Cortés.
</span>
Machu Picchu was an ancient civilization.
Grito de Dolores was a battle cry.
and Father Miguel Hidalgo was a priest.
Hope this helps!
