The author is trying to establish the point that the food provided to the soldiers was of poor quality and in little quantity.
<h3>How can we identify this?</h3>
- The author shows how the food provided to the soldiers was compared to fodder, that is, food inappropriate for humans.
- The author shows how this food could be compared with the feeding of pigs, which highlights the poor quality of the food.
- The author reinforces how inappropriate food was consumed anyway, as it was all the soldiers had.
In the text, the author wants to draw attention to how the soldiers were neglected and fed in a precarious, unhealthy, and insufficient way, not being possible to compare it with food for humans.
This kind of food left the soldiers hungry and weak, preventing them from being able to fulfill their responsibilities as required.
In this case, the author satirizes food, trying to call attention to a change and showing the dissatisfaction of those who need to eat this way.
Learn more about satire:
brainly.com/question/20772859
#SPJ1
The German people went along with the Nazi policy because they were scared of what would happen to this if they didn't. It's sad and unfortunate, but they would rather go along with the policy and keep there own lives.
I think that Hitler saw in Austria the chance to increase the number of loyal, German soldiers - Austrians speak German and are culturally similar so it was easy to include them into the German army and so quickly acquire a great number of loyal soldiers who spoke the language and shared the culture with the Germans.
<span />
A horse. My ancestors were farmers, thus a horse would be the most useful to me. It can help you care for your crops, and allow you to travel to town to purchase and sell products.
They were there against the civil right worker's murders. While the black population at the time was allowed to vote, in the Southern states they were withheld from voting by all sorts of idiotic reasons.
