This makes no sense. Where is the work?
Answer:
The statement states that taxes paid by the population to reduce the national debt will be converted into benefits for the population itself. So, in the end, the population is not spending money, just putting it in different places.
Explanation:
National debt is the term that refers to the debts that the government of a country has to finance works and improvements in the country that cannot be paid with the taxes paid alone. However, this debt will be paid by the collection of taxes, which may become higher, so that these works can be carried out. In a simplified way, governments understand that the expenses of the national debt must be paid by the generations of citizens who will benefit from these expenses, as this allows the population not to lose money, but to exchange it for benefits, that is, the national debt reallocates the population's money in works and actions that will improve the lives of this population, for this reason, governments claim that the national debt is like taking money out of the left pocket and putting it in the right pocket.
Finland scored at top on nearly on all the measures.
Explanation:
Finland has created an educational system based on the equality where everyone’s potential can be used and develop. Last year, Finland conducted an OECD test in which adults of the 24 countries age from 16-65 were measured on many aspects such as literacy, numeracy, and other problem-solving skills in which Finland scored very well.
The test showed that all younger Finns who had the opportunity to attend the compulsory basic school after the reforms had excessive knowledge those who were aged, and who were educated before the reforms, knew the average.
I’m not 100% sure but I think it is B; rainforest ( but I may be wrong )
The dating of artifacts is done by a carbon dating age system based on
the development of tools and technology. They used the carbon that is left in
the artifacts of the deceased.
