Pros
it keeps the editors safe
if they make a mistake people can't come after them
people cannot communicate with them over subjects they have written about
cons
people can't give feedback to let them know if it is incorrect
editors can make things up on a page and fool many people
Answer:
B). He wants to help readers imagine Neto's story and understand his conflict.
Explanation:
As per the question, option B i.e. 'He wants to help readers imagine Neto's story and understand his conflict' displays the reason for which the author has included Neto's real-life experience. <u>Her real-life experience would provide a sensory experience to readers through which they would be able to imagine his situation, conflicts he had undergone, etc. </u>This would help the readers connect to his story and display a more emphatic response. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
The word that best fits the blank part of the statement is 'ask'.
<span>I will ask John if he knows the address.
</span>
<span>Thank you for posting your question. I hope you found what you were after. Please feel free to ask me more.</span>
Answer:
An Ad Hominem fallacy is when someone personally attacks you to avert the audience from the real point.
Explanation:
<u>Example</u>: Person 1 - <em>"We should raise the minimum wage!"</em>
Person 2 - <em>"Oh please, don't listen to her, she's not even smart</em>
<em> enough to run a business!"</em>
Person 1 attacked Person 2 without even saying why raising the minimum wage is a bad idea. Ad Hominem is when someone insults another person instead of giving reasoning to why their opinion/statement is a bad idea. They try and steer you away from the point so that you agree with them. Maybe Person 1 isn't smart enough to run a business, but maybe she has a good idea in why they should raise the minimum wage.
