True. such as with pesticides, they are used to reduce harmful insects to crops but they often re harmful to the health of people consuming those crops
"Ammonification" is NOT a process that drives the carbon cycle.
<u>Option: B</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The organisms circulate carbon-di-oxide in carbon cycle by going through respiration, decomposition, sedimentation, and photosynthesis process but not ammonification. Basically the actual source of nitrogen is agricultural, when a plant or animal passes or an animal disperses waste.
In the remains, bacteria or fungi turn the organic nitrogen back into ammonium, a cycle called ammonisation or mineralisation. Then the micro-organisms generate metabolically required energy from organic nitrogen oxidation into ammonium. Ammonium is then essential for assimilation and absorption into amino acids or for use in other metabolic applications.
The only one that makes sense is size. because there could be other minerals the same size. so size wouldn't be a property to help identify
The pathway would be over active, If a ligand were stuck in the G-protein-linked receptor.
<h3>What usually happens when a ligand binds to a receptor protein?</h3>
When the ligand attached to the internal receptor, a change occurs that shows at DNA-binding site on the protein.
The ligand-receptor complex moves into the nucleus where it binds itself to regions of the chromosomal DNA. It promotes the initiation of the process of transcription so we can conclude that if a ligand were stuck in the G-protein-linked receptor, the pathway would be over active.
Learn more about ligand here: brainly.com/question/1869211
