1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
11

Which sentence has incorrect subject-verb agreement?

English
2 answers:
Andreas93 [3]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. The red dress of the model sparkle down the runway

Explanation:

A subject verb agreement simply mean that the subject and verb must agree with each other in either number or in tense. The verb in option A, "<em>sparkle</em>", can be considered a plural verb, which doesn't agree with the singular noun, "<em>dress</em>". In order for this sentence to make sense, we would have to revise the whole of the sentence to be plural, or just change the verb to a singular tense.

The red dress of the model sparkles down the runway.

The red dresses of the models sparkle down the runway.

kiruha [24]3 years ago
3 0

The answer is A.

The subject of the sentence (the person or thing doing the action) has to agree in number with the verb (the word representing the action).

You might be interested in
On page 146-147, Dally’s attitude toward the police could best be described as- A) considerate. B) spiteful. C) uninterested. D)
Alex17521 [72]

Answer: I would say  B or C but I need more context

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which sentence uses the comparative form of an adverb?
DedPeter [7]
A. <span>Christine ran slower than her sister. 
<em>Slower </em> is comparing Christine's speed to the speed of her sister.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The entries on a works cited page must be:
saw5 [17]
A. Alphabetical order by authors last name.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What/where does the constitution give the president the diplomatic power?
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

Explanation:

Hamilton, although he had expressed substantially the same view in The Federalist regarding the power of reception, adopted a very different conception of it in defense of Washington’s proclamation. Writing under the pseudonym, “Pacificus,” he said: “The right of the executive to receive ambassadors and other public ministers, may serve to illustrate the relative duties of the executive and legislative departments. This right includes that of judging, in the case of a revolution of government in a foreign country, whether the new rulers are competent organs of the national will, and ought to be recognized, or not; which, where a treaty antecedently exists between the United States and such nation, involves the power of continuing or suspending its operation. For until the new government is acknowledged, the treaties between the nations, so far at least as regards public rights, are of course suspended. This power of determining virtually upon the operation of national treaties, as a consequence of the power to receive public ministers, is an important instance of the right of the executive, to decide upon the obligations of the country with regard to foreign nations. To apply it to the case of France, if there had been a treaty of alliance, offensive and defensive, between the United States and that country, the unqualified acknowledgment of the new government would have put the United States in a condition to become as an associate in the war with France, and would have laid the legislature under an obligation, if required, and there was otherwise no valid excuse, of exercising its power of declaring war. This serves as an example of the right of the executive, in certain cases, to determine the condition of the nation, though it may, in its consequences, affect the exercise of the power of the legislature to declare war. Nevertheless, the executive cannot thereby control the exercise of that power. The legislature is still free to perform its duties, according to its own sense of them; though the executive, in the exercise of its constitutional powers, may establish an antecedent state of things, which ought to weigh in the legislative decision. The division of the executive power in the Constitution, creates a concurrent authority in the cases to which it relates.

3 0
3 years ago
HELP PLZ!!!! ILL MARK BRAINLIEST!
tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

How onions got there flavor and

Color.       By:victoria purvis

A long time ago there lived a hateful king and queen. One day the king decided to make the national kingdom food onions. He said “they and sweet, healthy, and bright blue.”

When the little onion family heard this they were terrified. The father onion of this family said to his wife and seven daughters “ it will all be ok i’ll go and speak with the king.”

So early the next day his wife packed him food and water and kissed him goodbye as he set off on his long trip. When mr.onion got to the palace he asked to see the king about an important matter. When mr.onion finally got to see the king he said “ please oh, please change the national food I do not wish for me and my family to die.” The king replied by saying “ NO, onions are sweet, healthy, and best of all bright blue.”

Mr onion left sadly and suddenly he remembered the wizard who help those who believed in him. So he went to the wizards large fine wood cabin and said “oh great one me and my family are in trouble do to the king please, oh please help me.” The nice wizard simply said “ I shall help you, but you know the rules you must trust  me.” Mr. onion said “ yes of course great one.” The wizard started to chant and all of a sudden Mr. onion started to feel weird so he looked in the mirror and there he was as white as can be.

The wizard said “ now no one will eat you for you are plain and sour. Mr.Onion said his thanks and started to travel home. By the time he got there the king had changed his mind and the onion family was safe.

As Mr. onion grew older he started to wonder what would have happened if he hadn’t trusted the wizard, what would have happened? He just said to himself  “ you always have to trust one another to be happy.” and in his case safe to.  So the onion family lived happily ever after.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How can creed be used in a sentence?
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the significance of
    6·1 answer
  • In a long passage, the
    5·2 answers
  • Identify the adverbial phrase in the following sentence:
    7·2 answers
  • Write one concluding restatement of the gist of The Jungle chapter 14!!
    13·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! The audience for a piece of writing is the general public, and the purpose is to inform people about the r
    7·1 answer
  • Question 5 of 10
    5·2 answers
  • I honestly need help writing my essay
    12·1 answer
  • What cultural differences exist between Nene and Nnaemeka? How do these differences influence the perspective of each character?
    9·1 answer
  • Summary of the history of the civil rights movement​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!