Answer:
<u>They all used the idea of the Divine Right of Kings.</u> And, to avoid any riot or political enemies,<u> they isolated the local aristocracy or tried to use the aristocrats as allies.</u>
Explanation:
The idea of a Divine Right was proposed, for the first time, by the 17th century theologian Jacques Bénigne Bousset. Even if this conception was not something new in Europe - British monarchy follows this statement since the 10th century, it was the first time this conception became written law. <u>According to him, kings have a power that was given by God. Thus, the monarch didn't need to give explanations about his actions but for God. The monarchies that emerged in Europe were possible by the Absolutis: the absence of a power division, and there were no citizens, but people who were under the divine rule of a monarch elected by God.</u>
The writers of the US Constitution put into practice the idea of separation of powers by establishing three branches of government: the executive (responsible for the enforcement of laws), the legislative (responsible for the passage of laws), and the judicial (responsible for the deliberation of laws). These separate powers then became imbued with the system of checks and balances where no single branch can act completely independently from the other. Take, for example, the appointment of Supreme Court judges.
Appointing a Supreme Court judge is a responsibility of the President, the head of the executive branch. The president will pick a judge thereby influencing the judicial branch. However, the choice must first be ratified by the legislative branch, thereby giving them a deal of power in deciding who is going to become a Supreme Court judge. So there you can see that all branches have a role in this process, none of which can occur without the other branch having an impact.
Answer:
<h3><em>August</em><em> </em><em>heat</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>1</em><em>9</em><em>1</em><em>0</em><em> </em><em>short</em><em> </em><em>story</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>.</em><em>f</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>He</em><em>rvey</em><em> </em><em>about</em><em> </em><em>, </em><em>two</em><em> </em><em>men</em><em> </em><em>unknown</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>each</em><em> </em><em>other</em><em> </em><em>whose</em><em> </em><em>look</em><em> </em><em>at</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>other</em><em> </em><em>possible</em><em> </em><em>future</em><em> </em><em>suggest</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>one</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>them</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>murdered</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>other</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>murderer</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em> </em></h3>
The U.S Supreme Court
The Privileges and Immunities clause is addressed in the 14th amendment of the Constitution, which posits that no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.
Answer: Pequot Indians killed an English trader, which led to conflict.
You welcome.
