Answer:
Landskapet i Jemen är kontrastfullt. I inlandet finns berg och ett torrt klimat. Den långa kusten är ett ökenområde och mellan bergen och kusten ligger ett bördigt högland. Förutom Jemens fastland omfattar landet även 112 öar och landet gör anspråk på ögruppen Kuria Muria som tillhör Oman.
Explanation:
correct me if im wrong
I HOPE IT HELPS
<h2> </h2>
The three main particles of an atom are: electron, proton, and neutron.
This table shows the differences on the three properties: location, charge, and mass, for the three particles:
particle location charge (C) mass (g)
electron space around the nucleus - 1.6 * 10^ -19 9.11 * 10^ -28
proton nucleus + 1.6 * 10^ -19 1.673 * 10 ^ - 24
neutron nucleus 0 1.675 * 10 ^ 24
It is important to drive some conclusions that permit you to have a better picture ot these particles and their differences:
1) electrons are in the space around the nucleus in regions called orbitals. Those are not orbits, because the electrons are not orbiting the nucleous.
2) Both protons and neutrons are inside the nucleus of the atom.
3) Electrons and protons have opposite charges of the same magnitude. The number of protons and electrons in an atom are equal, that is why they are neutral. The neutrons, which are inside the nucleus, with the protons, does not have charge.
4) The mass of the protons and the neutrons are almost equal.The difference does not count for the usual calculations.
5) The mass of one electron is 1 / 1840 times the mass of one proton. A very low quantity.
6) Electron is a fundamental particle (it is not formed by other particles).
7) Protons and neutrons are not fundamental particles. They are formed by quarks.
Most of Africas native rain forest has been destroyed by development, agriculture, and forestry. Today, 80 percent of Africas rain forest is concentrated in central Africa, along the Congo River basin.
Answer:
Developing countries greatly need to boost economic investment in order to spur growth, boost jobs, transfer advanced technologies, reduce poverty and increase their capacity to expand social welfare programmes. Towards this end, most have constructed and coordinated vigorous policies to attract new foreign direct investment (FDI) and India is no exception to this (OECD, 2002; Stiglitz, 2006; Rao and Dhar, 2011b). Transnational corporations (TNCs), the source of most FDI, are powerful actors in the global economy and they, in turn, try to get the best possible deals from governments who are desperate to host them. In such a charged economic and political environment, there is no guarantee that FDI will implant these desired assets (Nunnenkamp, 2002; OECD, 2002; 2008; Lipsey, 2003). Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that TNCs bring a great many risks, as well as benefits, including labour exploitation, corrupt practices, including bribery, and the ability to unduly influence policy outcomes and monopolise domestic markets (Madeley, 1999; Richter, 2001; Farnsworth, 2004). Thus, TNCs carry great risks, for the citizens, economies and local communities of host countries enticing FDI in the hopes of securing seriously needed development assistance. This thesis analyses the potential benefits and disadvantages of FDI to India and its citizens as reported by elite policy stakeholders. The research is based on qualitative interviews in New Delhi, India with 40 participants from NGOs, IGOs, and policy and research organisations that target economic and social development issues. In addition, it utilises documentary and policy analysis methods in order to investigate India’s investment and development strategy through the Indian investment bureaux. Through this analysis, the thesis reveals that FDI to India brings both benefits and disadvantages to its citizens and economy. India’s current growth model is catering to the middle class consumer and employment needs and in this regard, FDI has increased opportunities and brought advantages. However, FDI is not bringing much benefit for those in the lower social classes. What’s worse, it is attributed to socioeconomic ills such as widening inequalities, increased social tensions, land displacement and the transport of low levels of global value chains which are rife with poor working conditions and exploitation.
Answer:
Ayeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Wsg My Ni-ggaaaaaa btw Did u answer ur own question =>= also were u attttttttttttttttttt i wanna talkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Explanation:
