1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRa [10]
3 years ago
11

Which two countries were in conflict because they both tried to settle in the Upper Ohio River Valley?

History
1 answer:
Mila [183]3 years ago
3 0
England and France were the two countries who were in conflict because they both tried to settle in the Upper Ohio River Valley. (French and Indian War)
You might be interested in
In which political system are both the religious and political authority in the hands of the government?
AVprozaik [17]

The answer is:

B. Theocracy

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Imagine you are doing a report on the Nuremberg Trials. Which primary source material would help you analyze the issues that the
vlada-n [284]
Joseph Goldhagens article on the holocaust. You could read a memoir of an SS officer called the death dealer the ss officer was the commander of aushwitz
7 0
3 years ago
How did the 14th amendment provide a way for the central government to extend its power over state and local government's?
yan [13]
It gave them power and wealth and help 
8 0
3 years ago
¿Porque y como se relacionan los fenómenos de la materia y la energía?
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

no se ask my friend

Explanation: no se lol

3 0
3 years ago
List down 5 pros and 5 cons of having laws.<br><br><br><br> C.L.E
klemol [59]

Answer:

5,5

Explanation:

5 pros:

1)Uniformity and Certainty:

Law provides Uniformity and certainty to the administration of justice. The same law has to be applied in all cases. There can be no distinction between one case and another case if the facts are the same.

2)Protection against arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions:

If the administration of Justice is left completely to the individual discretion of a judge, improper motives and dishonest opinions could affect the distribution of justice. Law as Fixed Principles of the law of justice avoids the danger of arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions.

3)Freedom from errors of individual judgement:

The fixed principles of law protect the administration of justice from the errors of individual judgement. Commenting on this aspect of law, the Greek Philosopher Aristotle observed that "to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden." This, in other words, means that "law is not always necessarily wise but on the whole and in the long run it is wiser than those who administer it".

4)Reliability :

There is another advantage of law is its reliability. It is more reliable than the individual judgements of the Courts. The human mind is fallible and judges are no exception. The wisdom of the legislature which represents the wisdom of the people is safer and more reliable means of protection than the momentary fancy of the individual judge.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

5 cons:

1)The rigidity of law:

An Ideal legal system keeps on changing according to the changing needs of the people. But because of the rigidity of law, it is unable to keep pace with the fast-changing society. There is always a gap between the advancement of society and the legal system prevailing in it. The lack of flexibility in law results in hardship and injustice to the people.

2)Conservative Nature:

Another disadvantage of law is that its Conservative Nature. Law is conservative in its approach. The Bar and Bench are generally conservative in their approach to the dispensation of justice. The result is is that very often the law is static. This is not conducive to a progressive society.

3)Formalism:

The Law suffers from excessive formalism greater emphasis laid on the form of law rather than its substance. Undue formalism causes unnecessary delay in dispensation of justice.

4)Complexity :

Another disadvantage of law is its Complexity. It is true that every law effort is made to make law as simple as possible but it is not possible to make every law simple. That is due to the Complex nature of modern society.Commenting on the advantages and disadvantages of law Salmond observed that if the benefits of the law are great, the evils too are not small. Be that it may, it cannot be denied law serves as an effective instrument of social change. Law must change to the changing condition.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was robespierre guillotined
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these best describes the term "flapper" in U.S. history?
    6·2 answers
  • what is the best explanation for why african slaves in english colonial society developed a new distincted new culture
    13·1 answer
  • Where were the first Portuguese settlements in Brazil?
    9·2 answers
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Why would the FTC and the Justice Department be concerned about the merger of two strong companies in a mar
    5·2 answers
  • During the Cold War, some people accepted the inevitability of a nuclear war and tried to plan for it. Many people objected that
    7·1 answer
  • What can you infer about Adam and Eve’s relationship? Use evidence from the last three paragraphs of the story to defend your an
    12·1 answer
  • How did world war one impact african americans?
    10·1 answer
  • Which US president signed NAFTA into law?
    6·2 answers
  • Every one say this prayer: Thank you God for letting me wake up to another bless day this morning and please forgive me for any
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!