All categories

3 years ago

How did demographic makeup of texas population drive political movements in the united states during the mid-19th century?

History

2 answers:

zmey [24]3 years ago

6 0

I believe the answer is A

9966 [12]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

A. Since most settlers in Texas had come from the South abolitionist leaders opposed Texas's proposed statehood.

Explanation:

During the 19th century, a great concern for politicians was the status of slavery in the country. In general terms, Northern states opposed it, while Southern ones supported it. However, this was a delicate balance of power that could be altered with the acceptance of new states. As Texas was mostly made up of Southerners, most of its population supported slavery. This led abolitionists leaders to oppose the statehood of Texas.

You might be interested in

Which of the following developments is an example of industrialization

VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

um I think your going to have to list the developments if your going to say "which of the following".

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Which best describes the peripheral nervous system?

tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

B. It transmits information that is received from stimuli.

HOPE THIS HELPS

-Todo <3

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The location of the Indian Ocean is represented by which number 1 2 3 4

Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

The indian ocean will be under Asia and to the right of Europe and to the left of Australia

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

How did the institution of slavery influence european and african life in the colonies?

Lelu [443]

Institutionally, imperialism regularly brought about the centralization of energy. At the point when settlements wound up noticeably autonomous they regularly either had establishments that had a tendency to unify control passed on from frontier run, or social and financial structures that unified power in a little first class that tended to oppose development toward democratization.

Socially, previous provincial states had subjective fringes that made it hard to make a bound together and lucid society. Intensifying the ethnic divisions created by subjective outskirts was the way that amid frontier period, the gap and overcome strategy was regularly utilized. This made an atmosphere of doubt between ethnic gatherings that showed itself in ethnic clash in the autonomous states.

A few experts differ that imperialism can be reprimanded for the worldwide south's underdevelopment today. Some battle that Africa was immature before Europeans arrived, so the clarification for the present underdevelopment must be looked for in culture, geology or history that pre-date imperialism. They additionally take note of that a few nations that were never colonized or just quickly colonized likewise encounter underdevelopment today.

Different pundits call attention to that the genuine pilgrim structure was very little in many states and that such a little framework of people couldn't have caused the far reaching changes that are frequently credited to pioneer run the show.

Also, a few commentators point to the way that expansionism bettered the general population in the states in some courses by enhancing future, training and wellbeing rehearses. Further, the way that some previous settlements have made some significant monetary progress likewise indicates the way that imperialism was not determinative of financial results today.

4 0

3 years ago

How did the arrival of the European settlers on the east coast of North America impact the Native Americans?

elixir [45]

European settlers pushed many ancient North American tribes off of their land. Either by force, or by disease. Hope I helped! ;)

5 0

3 years ago