Explanation:
I have answered it look okay,friend.
Answer:
The Allies responded to German occupation of the Rhineland by remaining neutral because they feared another war.
Explanation:
The re-occupation of the Rhineland was a measure taken by Nazi Germany in 1936 to end the demilitarization of the Rhineland in violation of international agreements and to return troops to the region. On March 7, German troops marched to the Rhineland to the delight of the Germans and did not face resistance as they progressed. The French had not sent their troops into motion. In this situation, Britain did not want to take the initiative before the French, but began to pursue a policy of condescension towards Germany after the demilitarization of the Rhineland was abolished. In political terms, Hitler succeeded exactly where he wanted it to, regaining Germany's pre-World War I position.
Committing su1cid3........
To be reticent is to not reveal one's thoughts readily. In this case, it is the reticence of the author. The author does not reveal their thoughts readily. If the narrator or author refuses to do something, it is made known that he is doing something. The something here is him refusing. If he acts as if the situation is normal, I'd assume he is acting in such a way that would be nonreactionary of the actions from the provoker. I would safely choose the last option as sorrentino's exercising of authorial reticence.
