1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inn [45]
3 years ago
15

Discussion Questions:

History
1 answer:
gregori [183]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Chief Seattle considered strange that the American government would want to buy the land on which the tribe is living because he questioned the President of the United States how he wanted to put a price on elements that had no material or monetary value such as the freshness of the air, or the beauty of the sky. How he questioned US President Franklin Pierce, there was a price for the sparkle of the water.

Chief Seattle's view of this land was that mother Earth was something sacred for the Native American Indians. Nature was holy for his tribe. All the elements of nature were sacred and celebrated by the Native Indians. That is why they performed dances to the elements and chants, to thank mother nature for everything it provided.

You might be interested in
The US constitutional establish a system of checks and balances which of the following
julsineya [31]

Answer:

what

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What compromises did the delegates agree on during the convention
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

the Constitution ratified by all 13 states, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had to reach several compromises. The three major compromises were the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the Electoral College.

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me​
AfilCa [17]

Answer: b

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which territory gained limited independence after the spanish-american war?
Luda [366]

answer = Cuba (APEX Class ;)

7 0
3 years ago
What was An effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Scott v. Sandford
inessss [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The American revolution could also be called “revolutionary” because ?
    13·1 answer
  • According to the texas judicial campaign fairness act what dollar amount is a law firm
    11·1 answer
  • Why was Egypt considered monarchy
    15·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the missouri compromise apex?
    10·2 answers
  • What strategy is this ad using to get people to support its
    14·2 answers
  • Congress may propose an amendment to the constitution whenever:
    11·1 answer
  • Why did some US politicians believe that the Louisiana Purchase went against the US Constitution?
    10·2 answers
  • Please help. Right answer only.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following helped the Qin Dynasty unite China?
    6·1 answer
  • What level of government should you depend on for sanitation in your neighborhood?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!