1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olin [163]
3 years ago
11

The Share Our Wealth movement was: a. led by Father Charles E. Coughlin and directed at Catholics. b. introduced by Franklin Roo

sevelt as part of the New Deal. c. led by Henry Ford and directed at auto manufacturers. d. led by Dr. Francis Townsend and directed at Americans over the age of sixty. e. led by Louisiana senator Huey Long and gained a national following.
History
1 answer:
REY [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Option D, led by Louisiana senator Huey Long and gained a national following, is the right answer.

Explanation:

A movement led by Huey Long during the Great Depression is known as Share Our Wealth Movement. It was a poverty program for the poor. He appealed to the rich of the country to donate their money among the poor or those who don't have any or much. Therefore, it may be said that it was a program designed to provide a satisfactory living standard to all the American population.

You might be interested in
Relationships among privet individuals or companies are governed by?
Sergio039 [100]
Relationships among private individual or companies are governed by
<span>civil law.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is 3
Triss [41]

the Arctic

Reset

low-density region.

6 0
2 years ago
Which aspect of English government tradiations did not influence leaders in the United States
alexdok [17]

Answer: Granting unrestricted Freedom to All Religions

Hope this Helps :-)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
2 years ago
What major events lead the U.S. to become involved in WW2?
amm1812

Answer:

When Japan threw a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and many soldier's lives were lost.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Winning the war in the Pacific with challenging for the allies because
    12·1 answer
  • In the mid-1800s, western settlers and American Indians differed in their views about
    7·2 answers
  • Chinese immigrants in the United States have a long history, but many Chinese-American communities still have a distinct Chinese
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the progressives support the woman suffrage movement
    5·1 answer
  • Industrialism had no effect on WWI<br> True or False?
    11·2 answers
  • Mauritania, Morocco, and Algeria were controlled by Spain. true/false
    9·2 answers
  • 1 During what years was Reconstruction happening in America?
    8·1 answer
  • Which invasion of the Roman Empire was the first to reach the city of Rome?
    11·1 answer
  • List 2 lands that Columbus founded?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was Bradburn given the position of Commander at Anahuac?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!