Answer:
possessive Determinants
Explanation:
Given - The determinants that indicate who owns something or to whom it belongs are the:
Solution -
The determinants that indicate who owns something or to whom it belongs are possessive Determinants.
The determinants possessive tonics always go behind the name to which they refer and agree in gender and number with the noun to the that accompany it . Example : A friend of mine is coming today.
Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
Answer:
Explanation:
The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.
However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.
When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.
Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).
Answer:
Liberals consider that the lack of government participation in social and economic issues are what generate inequality, poverty and social backwardness in certain groups of the American population.
Thus, the lack of government participation to provide social welfare and regulate the inherent racism of African-Americans and other minorities is what in turn generates social exclusion, given that for reasons of discrimination they do not obtain the same jobs, opportunities or education as the white. This, as a consequence, generates poverty, inequality and pushes many of these people to the scourges of addictions, crime and other negativities.
Thus, racism and inequality are two issues that go hand in hand when explaining why many prisons are populated by people of certain races described as minorities in the country.
