1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
joja [24]
3 years ago
11

Solve the inequality

Mathematics
1 answer:
Lera25 [3.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

2cos(-1)<0

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Estimate the solution to the system of equations. You can use the interactive graph below to find the solution.−3x+3y=9 2x−7y=−1
hjlf

Answer:

  (x, y) = (-1.4, 1.6)

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph shows the solution pretty clearly. It seems no estimation is required.

5 0
3 years ago
3m - (7m+12) =2 (m-3)
viktelen [127]
Remove parentheses
3m - 7m+12 = 2 m-3

collect like terms
3m-7m-12 = 2m-6

move terms
-4m - 12 = 2m-6

collect the like terms and calculate
-4m-2m = -6+12

divide both sides by -6
-6m=6

m= -1

7 0
3 years ago
These box plots show daily low temperatures for a sample of days in two
lara [203]

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which graph shows the line that best fits the data points given?
stiv31 [10]
U probably need to add in a picture
4 0
3 years ago
A genetic experiment involving peas yielded one sample of offspring consisting of 420 green peas and 174 yellow peas. Use a 0.01
slavikrds [6]

Answer:

a) z=\frac{0.293 -0.23}{\sqrt{\frac{0.23(1-0.23)}{594}}}=3.649  

b) For this case we need to find a critical value that accumulates \alpha/2 of the area on each tail, we know that \alpha=0.01, so then \alpha/2 =0.005, using the normal standard table or excel we see that:

z_{crit}= \pm 2.58

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=420+174=594 represent the random sample taken

X=174 represent the number of yellow peas

\hat p=\frac{174}{594}=0.293 estimated proportion of yellow peas

p_o=0.23 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.01 represent the significance level

Confidence=99% or 0.99

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of yellow peas is 0.23:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.23  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.23  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.293 -0.23}{\sqrt{\frac{0.23(1-0.23)}{594}}}=3.649  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z>3.649)=0.00026  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

b) Critical value

For this case we need to find a critical value that accumulates \alpha/2 of the area on each tail, we know that \alpha=0.01, so then \alpha/2 =0.005, using the normal standard table or excel we see that:

z_{crit}= \pm 2.58

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the slope between the points and
    8·1 answer
  • Does anybody know this ??
    12·1 answer
  • GIVING OUT BRAINLIEST ANSWER!!!!!
    15·2 answers
  • A light bulb consumes
    9·2 answers
  • Two bird watchers position themselves at point A (the beach) and point C (the shed) which are 111 feet apart. The both spot a ra
    6·1 answer
  • Help me there’s a time limit on this
    10·2 answers
  • 2x - 7 &lt; - 4x + 5 on graph and write the inequality.
    7·1 answer
  • Help with this question please
    11·1 answer
  • What is the angle of GHD?
    11·1 answer
  • The athlete jogged a distance of 4850 yards in 20 minutes. What is the time needed to cover 9215 yards at the same rate?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!