They fought for home and had a home-field advantage. They also had knowledge of the area. They had the french on their side.
<span>popular sovereignty is what i think it is </span>
Answer:
The US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family is described below in complete detail.
Explanation:
The Dred Scott judgment was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that has existed in a free state and region did not authorize a slave character, Dred Scott, to his independence.
They dictated that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had parents who were slaves, had no constitutional avenue in court. They believed that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. In the cores of the court, Dred Scott had no constitutional right to demand his freedom.
The Constitution<span> of 1776 established the former colony's </span>first<span> independent government. ... The </span>Constitution<span> was amended in 1777 when </span>South Carolina <span>became the second colony to ratify the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were the </span>first written constitution<span> of the United States of America.</span>