What does it mean when a murder is justified?

In which of the following ways do utilitarians and Aristotle stand united against Rawls’s liberalism? a) Utilitarians and Aristo

jekas [21]

Answer:

b) Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

Explanation:

Utilitarians believe that the interest of government should be the same as that of the people, the reason is that, as a whole, the greatest liberty of people is a function of the welfare the people wish to enjoy, and this eads to the possibility and the desirability of progressive social change through peaceful political processes.

At the same time, Aristotle believe that government should govern for the general good or interest of the people, he concluded that, a kind of constitutional democracy, is the most ideal, as it sought for general interest of the people, in which rich and poor respect each other’s rights and the best-qualified citizens rule with the consent of all.

On the contrary, Rawls Liberalism believe that government should only uphold what is ideal, by balancing what is right with justice. According to him, government should protect the citizens, but not necessarily giving in to the aggregate pleasure of the people, that is, doing what is right, which will be supported by reasonable people as against what is considered good.

Hence, Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

5 0

3 years ago

Question

netineya [11]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you forgot to attach the picture of the vehicles, we can say the following.

The two options you have in order to abide by the Move Over law is that as soon as you see the first response vehicle coming your way, you have to move. If you can't move over for whatever reason, or in the case you are driving on a two-lane road, you have to reduce your speed. The law indicates that your speed reduction must be 20 mph less than the official speed limit.

This way, first response vehicles such as ambulances, police cars, sanitation vehicles or wreckers, can pass through and get to the site as soon as possible to offer help.

7 0

3 years ago

Which term refers to an institution created by a society to enforce public policies?

Savatey [412]

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

Democracies have something called the "consent of the governed" where the people trust the Government (institution) to create and enforce public policies as approved by the people.

Hope this helps! :)

7 0

2 years ago

In September, Amina hired Bryan as a delivery man. Bryan was to commence work on 1 November. On 1 October, Amina wrote to Bryan

Tcecarenko [31]

Answer: The answer is explained below

Explanation:

A layoff is a termination of an employment at the employer's will. A layoff may be either temporary or permanent and can occur for reasons such as new technology, downsizing, or changes in market conditions. In this case with regards to the question, Amina told Bryan that his service is no longer needed due to an economic circumstances. While accepting and signing a job offer, there are legal agreement which has to be made.

Here,an anticipatory breach occurs when Amina states, in advance of the due date that Bryan was meant to start the job that she intends not fulfilling the agreement of having him as a delivery man.

In this situation, Bryan can't sue Amina because it wasn't her fault that an economic situation arises. If he had left a previous job to take Amina's offer, that could have been a different case.

According to the labour welfare law, in case any employer rejects the job offer the individual can raise a concern against him. An economic conditions can come up anytime so Bryan shouldn't sue Amina.

5 0

3 years ago

What court case gave the supreme court the power of judicial review

Katarina [22]

Marbury v. Madison was the case which gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.

Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was the case in which the Supreme Court, where the Court asserted its authority for judicial review, calling a law unconstitutional.

In the end of the Judge’s opinion in this judgment, Chief Justice John Marshall explained that this is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to reverse the unconstitutional law because it is necessary result of a Judge’s pledge to maintain the writings of the Constitution as directed in Article 6 in our Constitution.

The Judicial review can be defined as the power of Supreme Court to check and decide in case of a violation of existing law.

6 0

3 years ago