Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- Throughout the macroeconomic equilibrium, the aggregate supply curve becomes equivalent to something like the supply curve, the real GDP seems to be comparable to potential Output (GDP), however, if frictional as well as systemic unemployment seems to be the maximum total poverty throughout the longer term.
- Consequently, whenever the economy seems to be in macroeconomic equilibrium, the argument which is not accurate would be that the businesses would have excess power.
So that Option C is the right answer.
Answer:
1st may of 2020, lol let not....
Answer:
The percentage change in nominal GDP from 2013 to 2014 was 4.29%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was 1.48%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was higher than the percentage change in real GDP from 2011 to 2012. FALSE
Explanation:
In order to calculate this we just have to calculate the percentages with a rule of thirds:

To calculate the first one we use the nominal GDP which is the GDP with the current market value:

To calculate the change in real GDP we use the values adapted to a pre-agreed monetary value, in this case the dollar at 2009:

To calculate the 2011 to 2012 we insert the values:

So with this we know that it is wasn´t higher the percentage change from 2012-2013, than that of 2011-2012
Answer:
Project A's payback period = 2.23 years
Project B's payback period = 3.3 years
Explanation:
project A project B
initial investment $290,000 $210,000
useful life 6 years 11 years
yearly cash flow $83,653 + $46,500 $46,000 + $17,727
= $130,153 = $63,727
salvage value $11,000 $15,000
payback period $290,000 / $130,153 $210,000 / $63,727
= 2.23 years = 3.3 years