Answer:
por ser violencia contra todos los derechos de todas las personas
Explanation:
nose
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Russia, United States, Japan
While if only 35% were seated, that means that 65% were not seated. And since it tells us 91 students were not seated, 91 is the 65% of the total amount of students. So we set up a proportion 91/65 =x /100 . When we cross multiply we get 9100=65x, divide by 65 on both sides and get 140=x. Therefore, there were 140 students in all.
