Answer: Candidates are not getting timely feedback about their applications.
Explanation:
From the information provided in the question, we realize that Antoine has a team of knowledgeable, and ethical recruiters at Luvia Insurance.
Despite this, Antoine observed that the number of applicants who accept offers has reduced and he realized that developed an unfavorable opinion of Luvia Insurance.
The most likely reason for this is that the candidates do not getting timely feedback about their applications. In a case whereby this occurs, the applicants would go to other companies who have reviewed their applications quicker and they've gotten a feedback from on time.
Answer:
d) All of above
Explanation:
A partnership agreement provides guidelines on how two or more partners will manage their partnership business. It is the contract that dictates each partner's roles, profit and loss sharing formula, and personal liability of each in case of insolvency.
In the absence of a partnership agreement, the law prescribes that partners share profits and losses equally. All partners assume equal rights to responsibilities and liabilities.
Answer:
B) companies to turn over responsibility for establishing and maintaining internal controls for financial reporting to auditors.
Explanation:
Sarbanes- Oxley is popularly called SOX and which is also know as the ''Public Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act'' in the United States' Senate and ''Corporate and Auditing Accountability, Responsibility and Transparency Act'' is a USA federal law the sets out new regulations for all U.S public company boards, management and public accounting firms. Some part of the Act makes provisions that apply to privately owned companies.
The Sarbanes-Oxley is named after the bill sponsors that is Senator Sarbanes and a U.S Representative known as Micheal G. Oxley and this bill makes sure that the top management of a company must each individually determine and certify the accuracy of all financial information provided or stated. This bill was enacted in 2002 to curb a number of major corporate accounting scandals, especially those affecting big accounting firms like ; Enron, Tyco International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems, and WorldCom that cost investors to loose a lot of money when the their shares collapsed.
As a guiding principal companies and organizations are supposed to adhere to the options mentioned above except for option B which states: companies to turn over responsibility for establishing and maintaining internal controls for financial reporting to auditors.
Answer:
19.50%
Explanation:
In this question, we apply the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) formula which is shown below
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
For Stock R
= 3% + 2.5 × (13% - 3%)
= 3% + 2.5 × 10%
= 3% + 25%
= 28.00%
For Stock S
= 3% + 0.55 × (13% - 3%)
= 3% + 0.55 × 10%
= 3% + 5.5%
= 8.50%
The difference would be
= 28% - 8.5%
= 19.50%
It would be the Banking act of 1933; made so that banks would be unable to invest their money so that people would have more faith in them.
