I really dont know lol........
The correct answer is I and III only.
When you read a text and want to decide what the author's purpose for writing it was, then you need to take a look at the evidence he or she presented, as well as whether or not that evidence was appropriate. What is irrelevant here, however, is how fast or how slow you read the text - that has nothing to do with the author's purpose.
Tell me your favorite hobby or interest. A hobby is an activity done regularly in one's leisure time for pleasure. It cant be A becuase that is not what a hobby is. It cant be B because learning something cant exactly be a hobby. It cant be C because it just dosent make sense. So the answer is D.
Hope this helps
Julie's approach was aimed at showing her positive points about the profession and the way she works. Warren's approach, on the other hand, was to show his strengths and the weaknesses of his competitors.
Although you didn't show the context of your question, it was possible to find a question similar to yours, which showed an exchange of emails between the partners of a law firm, where different partners were interested in working on a specific case. You can see all the emails and the question context in the attached screenshots.
When we read all the emails, we can see that:
- A famous singer being accused and looks for lawyers who can serve him.
- Three lawyers are interested in the case and send emails to the director of the company, showing why they should be chosen.
- Julie, one of the lawyers, shows that she is very interested in the case and that she is a very focused person, that she believes in the client's innocence, and that she has many professional characteristics that are favorable to this case.
- She doesn't say anything about the other lawyers who have an interest in the case.
- Warren, another lawyer interested in the case, takes a different approach. In addition to showing his professional points, he shows what are the negative points of his competitors.
- Furthermore, Warren states that he would like to work on this case, even if he is not chosen to lead the team of lawyers.
With this, we can see that Julie, focused only on the skills she has, while Warren focused on the skills he has and the disadvantages of other candidates.
More information:
brainly.com/question/17343927?referrer=searchResults