After a procedur has been completed, some questions can be asked to help evaluate the results. Here are these questions:
1. Were the steps completed in order?
- This is important to ask because it may be necessary to change the order the next time the procedure is done.
2. What could be done differently in the future?
- This is important to ask because it can find problems with the procedure that was done to improve for the next one.
3. Was the expected outcome reached?
- If the expected outcome wasn't reached maybe the procedure shouldn't be repeated. Unless of course the surprise outcome was something good.
The response provided considers the appeal to logic, to character, and to emotion in the analysis, as expressed in options A, B, and C and explained below.
<h3>What is a rhetorical appeal?</h3>
A rhetorical appeal is a strategy used in order to convince one's audience of something. There are three possible appeals we can use to persuade our audience:
- Appeal to logic or logos.
- Appeal to character/credibility or ethos.
- Appeal to emotion or pathos.
The sample response provided in the instructions takes all the appeals into consideration when analyzing John Muir's statement. Let's break it down here:
- He appeals to logic by giving evidence about the destruction. - Appeal to logic.
- He seems very credible because he knows about the history of individual trees. - Appeal to character.
- Finally, he makes readers want to save the trees by using strong emotional language throughout. - Appeal to emotion.
Therefore, we can select options A, B, and C as the correct answers for this question.
Learn more about rhetorical appeals here:
brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ1
Based on the information given, the validity and reliability of an information will be determined based on the relevance and accuracy of the information.
<h3>
Credible sources.</h3>
It should be noted that when writing, it's important to use credible sources and facts.
The validity and reliability of an information will be determined based on the relevance and accuracy of the information. It should be factual and relevant.
Learn more about credible information on:
brainly.com/question/1279931
I think the author does not present adequate evidence to support his argument. This is because all he wrote was a scenarios that he can envision given the circumstances. There are no accurate data given like statistics, transcriptions, or even bills or laws that supports his views. All I can glean is that these are suppositions that may or may not be true given the circumstances it is presented with.
Answer: Daybreak
Explanation:
daybreak is an iamb look it up duh
