Answer:
Explanation:
I think this question is rooted in WWII when the Japanese were being put into interment camps- so I will answer based on that. The United States, regardless of race, has no justification to take away the rights of its citizens. Even in times of war, someone needs to be accused of being a spy with actual hard <em>evidence</em> before they should be subjected to that.
<u>Answer:</u>
B) Union troops wanted to strike fear into Confederates by devastating their towns.
C) Union troops sought to destroy resources that Confederate troops needed to fight.
These statements reveal about Union tactics during the Civil War.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Union state tactics to win the civil war was simple, which was aimed to break the resource supply so that the confederate army would become vulnerable and shatter the towns on their way to create fear among the people.
<u>The northern army had 5 major goals-
</u>
1. To block their help from abroad by taking control over the southern coasts.
2. Taking control over the Mississippi river so that it would separate Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas from other Confederate states.
3. To capture Richmond.
4. To shatter the morale of civilians
5. To use the troop size and break the spirit of the confederate army.
Answer:
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.
hope i helped.
Explanation:
Answer:
Similarity--both the US and France went through periods of adjustment on their way to a permanent government.
Difference--the US was able to create a democratic government and make changes from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution without a complete revolution and extreme violence. France on the other hand established a tyrannical government and then a dictatorship under the rule of Napoleon. It took more time and stages for France to find a democratic balance they were hoping for.
