Answer:
The correct answer is predictive validity test.
Explanation:
A predictive validity test is carried out in order to predict the performance that a collaborator will have in the future. With this dynamic, it is ensured that an honest employee is hired, and that he always acts under the rules of the organization to which he will belong. In general, there are discrepancies compared to what many people can do under certain circumstances, and this test is precisely what they want to know about the performance under different scenarios.
Answer:
Yes she should purchase this preferred stock.
Explanation:
Return on investment as a percentage = return/capital invested * 100
For Aeryn to decide whether she should purchase this preferred stock, its return on investment should be higher than or equal to 8%. The return on investment of this preferred stock is $40/$475 * 100 = 8.42%, which is higher than her required return therefore she should purchase the preferred stock.
Answer:
Decrease in income by $227,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of the change in the income in the case when the east territory is eliminated is shown below;
= -Sales + Direct cost + fixed cost - salary per year
= -$980,000 + $343,000 + ($450,000 - $40,000)
= -$980,000 + $343,000 + $410,000
= -$227,000
Hence, the amount of the change in the income in the case when the east territory is eliminated is -$227,000
Decrease in income by $227,000
Answer:
b. If the employer accepts Turner's counteroffer, Turner will recognize as gross income $55,000 per month [($480,000 + $180,000)/12].
Explanation:
Given that
Turner annual salary = $600,000
Counteroffer to received a monthly salary = $40,000 or $480,000 annually
And, $180,000 bonus in 5 years at the age of 65
So the benefit he will be getting would be after accepting the counter offer is
= ($480,000 + $180,000) ÷ 12 months
= $660,000 ÷ 12 months
= $55,000
