Because history tends to repeat itself and these stories echo events in real life.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
I think this shows how this was a failed version of democracy as the people that revolted were not heard and not pleased. Even though in france and Americas case there revolutions were not really just, it shows that the country representing them failed to please the people.
Hiram, Blanche, and Jonathan were all the officials belonging to African American community in the era of Reconstruction.
<h3>What is meant by slavery?</h3>
Slavery is the practice followed by the white people to treat black people as their slaves.
Hiram and Blanche were previously treated as slaves and then becoming the senators in the state of Mississippi. Jonathan was the secretary in the state of Florida who came to help in the reconstruction of the US country.
Therefore, none of the options is accurate as the option A and option B are totally incorrect and rest of the two are partially correct.
Learn more about the slavery in the related link:
brainly.com/question/9331183
#SPJ1
Answer:
Kohlberg defined three levels of moral development: preconventional, conventional, and postconventional. Each level has two distinct stages. During the preconventional level, a child's sense of morality is externally controlled.
Explanation:
Preventing genocide is one of the greatest challenges facing the international community.[1]<span> Aside from the suffering and grief inflicted upon generations of people and the catastrophic social, economic and political dislocations that follow, this ‘crime of crimes’ has the potential to destabilize entire regions for decades (Bosco, 2005). The shockwaves of Rwanda’s genocide are still felt in the eastern parts of the Democratic Republic of Congo nearly 20 years later, for example. Considerable resources are now devoted to the task of preventing genocide. In 2004 the United Nations established the Office of the Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide with the purpose to ‘raise awareness of the causes and dynamics of genocide, to alert relevant actors where there is a risk of genocide, and to advocate and mobilize for appropriate action’ (UN 2012). At the 2005 World Summit governments pledged that where states were ‘manifestly failing’ to protect their populations from ‘war crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity’ the international community could step in a protect those populations itself (UN, 2012). The ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) project, designed to move the concept of state sovereignty away from an absolute right of non-intervention to a moral charge of shielding the welfare of domestic populations, is now embedded in international law (Evans 2008). Just this year, the United States government has stated that ‘preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,’ and that ‘President Obama has made the prevention of atrocities a key focus of this Administration’s foreign policy’ (Auschwitz Institute, 2012). Numerous scholars and non-government organisations have similarly made preventing genocide their primary focus (Albright and Cohen, 2008; Genocide Watch, 2012).</span>
