Question:
The Dodd-Frank wall street reform and protection act stipulated that if more than $1 million is collected, the whistle-blower is entitled to _____ of the monies collected.
A) between 10 and 30 percent
B) a minimum of 50 percent
C) a minimum of 75 percent
D) between 50 and 75 percent
Answer:
The correct answer is A) Between 10 and 30 percent of the monies collected.
Explanation:
The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (also known as Dodd–Frank) is a US Federal Law that was instituted on July 21, 2010.
It was created to revamp the financial regulation in the aftermath of the Great Recession, and brought about reforms to all federal financial regulatory agencies and almost every part of the nation's financial services industry.
Under the act, whistle blowers were promised 10-30 percent of all monies collected.
Cheers!
Answer:
The Firm should not Buy and Install the press as it delivers a negative NPV of -$24,924 at 11% discount rate over its 4 year operations
Explanation:
The General rule is to appraise the investment based on various appraisal techniques.
A technique that should be considered must have special focus on the time value of money, the required rate of returns expected by the firm and other Cashflow considerations.
The Net Present Value (NPV) approach will be the best method to proceed with.
The NPV approach typically falls under the following decision tree:
a. If NPV is negative (Reject the proposal)
b. If NPV is positive (Accept if it's a singular project, Accept the highest positive NPV if it's for mutually exclusive Projects)
c. If Zero (this is the breakeven line at which the Project covers all its cost but does not return a profit.) Also referred to as the IRR
Kindly refer to the attached for detailed workings
The amount of money that I would have in the bank account at the end of one year is $1,100.
The real interest rate I would expect to earn on the deposit is 6%.
If I am saving for a gaming computer, at the end of next year I would have enough money.
<h3>What is the value of the money by next year?</h3>
The formula that can be used to determine the money in my bank account next year is:
FV = P (1 + r)^n
Where:
FV = Future value
P = Present value
R = interest rate
N = number of years
1000 x (1.1)^1 = $1,100
<h3>What is the real interest rate?</h3>
The real interest rate is the nominal interest rate less inflation rate.
The real interest rate = 10% - 4% = 6%
To learn more about future value, please check: brainly.com/question/18760477
Answer:
A. Additivity
Explanation:
Additivity simply means that the values of an objective function and total resources used can be found by adding all the contributions made by the objective functions and the decision variables of all resources used. That is, it assumes that the overall of an objective function is found by adding the contribution of each objective function to the overall. In additivity, interaction between variables doesnt exist.
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
