Answer: A. True
Explanation: If he were inexperienced in this field or he was doing it as his hobby (casual objectives) with no goal to reproduce or add to the data already published, or were there people involved in his research, then this would have been categorized as informal research. However this setting is strictly formal, and authenticity of data is mandatory. Print and online journal articles contain the case studies already researched thoroughly.
Ian is a uniquely good position here: the truth happens to be one of the best explanations he could possibly give. The fact that he quit his job to look after his sick mother, assuming that his former employer has positive things to say about him, is a solid reflection of his character and a sign that he was out of the job market not due to a lack of options, but a need to take care of a sick family member.
Ian should tell the truth, and explain the decision thoroughly to demonstrate the kind of person he is to the prospective employer, and what his priorities are.
Public good are non-rivalry and non-excludable goods. People can benefit these goods without affecting and reducing its availability to others. Disease prevention by the government is purely public good since it is important to every individual and each person must not have any limitations in receiving these kind of prevention.
Answer:
b) Brittany will pay more because she must pay the entire bill since she has not met her deductible while Brandon will have part of his bill paid by his policy.
Explanation:
since Brandon only $150 as the maximum amount his plan provides for a visit to any specialist, Brittany will have to pay more since Once she has met the deductible, the policy will cover the full cost of her visits.
Answer:
Hello, good morning. How's your day so far? thats the answer
