Which resulted from China’s isolation from the rest of the world?

2 answers:

5 0

For the answer to the question above asking which resulted from China’s isolation from the rest of the world? 
China did not keep up with the technological advances that were sweeping Europe.
So the answer is B. Development in China fell behind Europe.

Alex73 [517]2 years ago

3 0

The correct answer is B. The result of China's isolation from the rest of the world was that development in this country fell behind Europe.

In fact, by the mid 1800s, China was a poor, undeveloped country. Famines were common, and the peasant population was in a state of stagnation. The general social growth was very difficult, since the country did not have a developed industry.

The current development of the country (which has the second highest nominal GDP in the world, not its GDP per capita, which is ranked 100 in the ranking) is due more to the huge Chinese population than to a policy of cultural exchange and commercial with the rest of the world, since it is widely known that the Chinese Communist Party even today maintains policies of commercial isolation.

You might be interested in

How can new ideas lead to social and political change??

kirza4 [7]

Fresh change creates new opportunities An promises it gives the people something to work towards.

4 0

3 years ago

Help Me Please. I need help.

zvonat [6]

Answer:

i dont know how to do that

Explanation: just search it up and you ment get the answer

8 0

3 years ago

What was the outcome of the 1990 Myanmar election? How did the government respond?

melomori [17]

The election was won overwhelmingly by Aung San Suu Kyi. However, the government refused to honor the results of the election.

4 0

2 years ago

What did the Spanish and their indigenous allies hope to gain by presenting this image of Motecuzoma?

NARA [144]

Answer: The Spanish were trying to make the Aztec leader out to be a coward and weak.

The Spanish were attempting to give the impression of being powerful with their animals and technology.

Perhaps the Spanish were trying to give the impression that they were likely to win—thereby attracting more indigenous allies.

Explanation:

the following document based on indigenous account but filtered through imperial Spanish sensibilities suggested that the motecuzoma reacted with fright when presented with reports that were less than reassuring since they focused on fearsome weapons and animals of the Spanish. Given the material response of Aztecs to the Spanish invasion it seems highly unlikely that Motecuzoma or the azetecs would have expressed terror in such a humiliating fashion

5 0

3 years ago

Was Lincoln's vato of wade-Davis bill good or bad? and why?

timama [110]

This can be argued both ways.

Good: Lincoln's vetoing of the Wade Davis Bill ensured that the process of allowing the Confederate states to rejoin the Union would not be as difficult. The Wade Davis Bill called for a majority vote by Confederate citizens in order to rejoin the Union. At this time, a vote like this could have gone very wrong as numerous states would not have the votes necessary to rejoin the Union. Since Lincoln vetoed this bill, it never happened, probably saving the Union a significant amount of problems.

Bad: Radical Republicans probably saw this as bad, as they felt Lincoln's "Ten Percent Plan" let the Confederate states of too easy. The Radical Republicans wanted the Wade Davis Bill to ensure that the Confederate states would be loyal to the Union from now on. However, when Lincoln vetoed this bill, many Radical Republicans felt that the Confederates would allowed to join the Union again without much punishment.

3 0

2 years ago