When President George W. Bush ordered the invasion of to overthrow Saddam Hussein in 2003, he took a largely unilateral military
action. His stated purpose was to increase US national security . Presidents Clinton and Obama favored more multilateral efforts when intervening in countries such as Kosovo and Libya. Is there a justification for the US to engage in unilateral rather than multilateral military action overseas
Not really, every time the USA has tried military action overseas in the modern era, it usually failed and resulted in the country suffering bad set backs.
They were using the south for farming leading up to the civil war because they were using slaves to work in the fields to pick cotton as that was one of the top industries at the time
