Answer: The stage of cognitive development that Reina is in is the The concrete operational stage.
Explanation: According to Jean Piaget's theory of development, there are four stages of development. They are; sensorimotor; preoperational; concrete; and formal operational stages.
The concrete operational stage occurs in children between the age of 7 to 11 and in this stage, the child has learned to think in a logical manner if they are familiar with the concepts. Reina earning A's on her math tests is because she's already familiar with the concepts of multiplication and division.
Nationally recognized testing laboratories (NRTL) <u>test and list</u> electrical products to provide a basis for approval by inspectors in the field.
An independent organization known as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) certifies goods for the American market. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) recognizes NRTLs for products used in American workplaces in accordance with Federal Code 29 CFR 1910.7.
The NRTL certificate offers unequivocal proof that your electrical and electronic products meet the specifications needed for the American market. NRTL certification helps you to quickly reach hundreds of millions of consumers by offering assurance that your products meet the safety requirements to enter the United States.
To learn more about Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory, click
brainly.com/question/19578873
#SPJ4
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer:
Rule of law is a principle under which all persons, institutions, and entities are accountable to laws that are: Publicly promulgated. Equally enforced. Independently adjudicated.
Explanation:
sorry if wrong
