The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
It gave the government "too much" power over southern states.
1.This chalice sat on a church altar for use during religious rituals
2.This container was probably designed to protect the internal organ of the dead during mummification
alright i just gonna give the letters instead of typing 'em out :)
3.C
4.D
5.B
6.C
7.A
8.B
9.D
10.C
Answer:
Paying for the American Revolution.
Explanation:
Paying for the American Revolution. In 1790, the United States was heavily in debt from paying for the American Revolution. After the Revolutionary War, although victorious, the United States inherited a huge debt. Records show that by 1791, the US federal government debt was $77 million.
