The elements that would have to be in place for a contract to be unconscionable would be that
- They were under pressure
- They were misled
- They did not have the right information
<h3>What is meant by a contract?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that two people or more have agreed to do business with themselves.
In order to be a contract, one person would have to create a bargain and the other would be the one that would agree to the terms.
It is unconscionable at the time when the contract is done and the person or one of the parties is found not to have been able to make the contract agreement at their right frame of mind. In this case, the law has the power to protect this party.
Hence they would have to rule in his favor. Therefore to be unconscionable, a contract would have to have been misled, have been made under duress and without the adequate information.
Read more on contracts here:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
Answer:
11.68%
Explanation:
In this question, we apply the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) formula which is shown below
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
= 4.4% + 1.3 × (10% - 4.4%)
= 4.4% + 1.3 × 5.6%
= 4.4% + 7.28%
= 11.68%
The (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return) is also called market risk premium
Answer: cognitive dissonance
Explanation: Cognitive dissonance takes place in the fields of psychology when an individual holds two or more irrational beliefs, concepts, or principles, or takes part in a motion that runs counter to any of these three and thereby perspectives mental stress.
Inconvenience is caused by an individual's belief that conflicts with new interpreted proof (statistics) in which they attempt to take steps to address the inconsistency in order to minimize their distress.
In simple words, The concept behind cognitive dissonance shows that people find psychological continuity regarding their life span and the earth's objective reality.
Answer:
B. Persons on fixed incomes.
Explanation:
Inflation is a general increase in prices and fall in the purchasing value of money, therefore, a person with a fixed income will not be affected.
Answer:
According to the Blake/Mouton grid, Daniel falls under the produce-or-perish management style, also known as the authority compliance style
Explanation:
This management style is very autocratic, very much a Theory X management style.
Daniel is very autocratic, has strict rules and policies. In the short run, this management style can achieve high productive results, but in the long run the low morale of the workers will end up hurting their performance. Daniel believes that his employees are just a means to an end, and that their needs are secondary and not important.
