If the two territories had formed different states, the indigenous population would have greater political representation, and the state of Oklahoma would have a smaller indigenous population.
<h3>Why would the indigenous population have greater political representation?</h3>
- Because the state would have indigenous political representatives.
- Because the state government is made up of indigenous people.
- Because the political and social structure of the state would be geared towards the social well-being of the indigenous people.
The separation of the state of Oklahoma into two states would be very beneficial for the indigenous peoples as they would have greater political, social, and even economic relevance in the state formed by the indigenous territories, which would allow for greater representation at the national level.
Thus, Indians could structure their state by considering the social resources important to their tribes and choosing the best way to maintain their rights and duties as American citizens who live within the traditions of Native peoples.
Learn more about indigenous peoples:
brainly.com/question/27791311
#SPJ1
C. Replace the Articles of Confederation with an entirely new document.
The initial purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to revise to existing Articles of Confederation, after much debate it was decided that they would create a new document that gave more power to the national government. So they created the U.S. Constitution that we still use today.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The citizens started feeling like they were being treated as if they were second class
Answer:
Laws were made more consistent and predictable.
Explanation:
Hammurabi's Code influenced other codes of law to be more consistent and predictable.
It set the precedent for laws to be written in a standard format.
For example, the laws in Hammurabi's Code were all in the same format. The specific situation would be stated, then the punishment would follow it.