So these debates are usually over virtue ethics (basically what you value, how you value things etc.). One debate is between the philosophy of utilitarianism and deontology (consequentialism vs means based). Social problems and issues are often times evaluated under particular values. For (a simple) ex. a utilitarian would value implementing a policy to save the most people whereas a deontologist wouldn’t look to save the most people if it meant infringing on the rights of the individual. So a utilitarian would care more about extinction then the most gruesome possible death of one person. Hope this helps!
Answer:
forms with no projecting parts that could break
Explanation:
Egyptian statues and art in general were very strict in design. They had the right postures that did not express emotion or movement. They were realistic in body proportions, but the pharaohs were presented as larger than the common people. This way it could be determined who has a higher standing in society.
Egyptian art was present in the tombs as part of their elaborated death rituals. <u>Many of the sculptures presented there were reliefs or attacked to the background, and if they were freestanding they were done in the colossal fashion, so no part sticks out.</u> <u>Part of this was probably the fact that tomb raids were frequent and sculptures served the purpose to guide and benefit the deceased.</u><u> </u>Egyptians wanted them to preserve to help the person in the afterlife, so they made them as permanent as possible.
Beats in the measure and counts on notes
