The politics of Mexico takes place with the federal representative democratic republic where government is based on congressional system.
Explanation:
The border between the two countries states that peace and security are important for U.S security and international trade. The problems faced by the Mexican people are torture, extrajudicial killings and summary executions,sexual murder.
The Human Rights Watch describes that Mexican security forces have enforced widespread disappearances. There are four political parties they are PRI, The MORENA, and the PRD.
The federal government of U.S are divided into three branches executive, legislative, and judicial.
Thus these are the conflicts faced within Mexico affected relations with the United States.
Here is what i wrote for my essay:
World War I was settled by the victors at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. The “Big Four,” who made all the major decisions, were President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain, George Clemenceau of France, and of least importance, Italian Prime Minister Vittorio Orlando. Each major power had its own agenda coming to the Conference and not every aim was represented in the final treaties.
Wilson, Clemenceau, and Lloyd George all had different points of view at the Paris Peace Conference. For instance, lloyd George of Britain wanted to build a postwar Britain "fit for heroes". British aims at the conference were focused on securing France, settling territorial disputes, and maintaining their colonial holdings. Clemenceau of France wanted to weaken Germany so it could never threaten France. Having witnessed two German attacks on French soil in the last 40 years, France’s main concern was to ensure Germany would not be able to attack them again, so they pushed to weaken Germany militarily, strategically, and economically. Wilson of the U.S. wanted "peace without victory" with his fourteen points. The Americans’ vision was set out in Wilson’s Fourteen Points, which emphasized free trade, self-determination, and the founding of a League of Nations to support territorial and political independence of member nations.
PLEASE LIKE AND RATE MY ANSWER
Answer:
Laissez-faire, or free market capitalism, is an ideology that prescribes minimal public enterprise and government regulation in a capitalist economy.
Answer:Friedrich Engels was a philosopher and a communist. He saw history as a series of struggles between two social classes. He saw the development of factories and the rise of mass production as the paradigm of social abuse. He also believed that the masses that worked in these factories were alienated from the product of their labor, and that they lacked political and social power.
A factory owner would have likely seen things differently. He would have probably been happy about the rapid rate of industrialization during this time period. He would have also defended his position as owner of the means of production. Finally, it is likely that he would have seen his relationship with his employees as a fair one.
Explanation:
Option A. The disadvantage that secondary sources have is that they are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
<h3>What is meant by secondary sources?</h3>
This is the term that is used to describe the data that are known to already be in existence. These are the types of data that can be gotten from journals or from large government data base.
These types of data are very unlike the primary data that the researcher has to source and create for himself. The primary data would be gotten directly from the field by the researcher who wants to carry out an experiment to determine a phenomenon.
Read more on secondary data here: brainly.com/question/14806486
#SPJ1
Complete question
Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources? A.They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe. B.They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate. C.They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions. D.They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.
