All categories

3 years ago

One popular system for defining effective goals uses the acronym SMART, which stands for

2 answers:

4 0

One popular system for defining effective goals uses the acronym SMART, which stands for: SPECIFIC, MEASURABLE, ATTAINABLE, REALISTIC AND TIMELY.
SMART is an acronym that define the characteristic of a goal that is considered an excellent one. A goal that one wants to achieve must have some features which make it possible for one to achieve the goal. The goal must be specific, that is, one must be able to define specifically what one want to achieve. The goal must be measurable, that is, you must be able to measure the progress you have made so far. The goal must be attainable, it must be realistic, something that is possible for you to achieve. The must goal must also have a life span, that is, the period during which the goal must be achieved.

Alex777 [14]3 years ago

4 0

<span>SMART is an acronym that is used as a guide for effective goal setting. SMART stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timely. A goal should be Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timely so that you will be able to make your goals come true.</span>

You might be interested in

Bigbucks Brokerage provided the taxpayer $2,400 in bicycle commuting reimbursement in 2020. How much of that reimbursement, if a

blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

Bigbucks Brokerage

The whole amount of $2,400 must be included in the taxpayer's income.

Explanation:

The Bicycle Commuting Reimbursement in 2020, given under a Bicycle Commuter Tax Benefit program, is taxable as income to the employee. According to the provisions of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, the restriction placed on the Bicycle Commuter Tax Benefit will expire in 2026. The bicycle commuting reimbursement is a benefit that can only be offered by employers and is regarded as a taxable benefit to the affected employee.

5 0

3 years ago

Keenan has won the lottery for $10,000,000. He is offered a cash payment now of $7,500,000, or 10 annual payments of $1,000,000.

Katarina [22]

Answer:

a) 5,6%

b)$16 191 937.48

Explanation:

Download docx

7 0

3 years ago

sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. he endorses the products and deposits his compe

Degger [83]

A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.

Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.

Learn more about minority popularity here:

brainly.com/question/14457086

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago

The law of diminishing marginal returns holds for a situation in which Group of answer choices all inputs are variable. all inpu

Natasha_Volkova [10]

The law of diminishing marginal returns holds for a situation in which some inputs are variable and some inputs are fixed.

<h3>What is the law of diminishing marginal returns?</h3>

The law of diminishing marginal returns states that after some optimal level of capacity is reached in a production process, an additional factor of production would result in a lessening of output (quantity of production).

In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that the law of diminishing marginal returns would only hold for an economic situation in which some inputs are variable and some inputs are fixed.

Read more on diminishing marginal returns here: brainly.com/question/13767400

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

Inacio Corporation uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. Data concerning the first processing departme

e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

Inacio Corporation

The cost per equivalent unit for materials for the month in the first processing department is closest to:

= $14.50

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Units Materials Conversion

Beginning work in process 2,300 $14,400 $6,500

Percentage of completion 75% 20%

Units started during the month 11,000

Total units available 13,300

Units transferred to the next 9,900 100% 100%

Ending work in process 3,400 90% 30%

Costs added during the month $173,500 $243,500

Equivalent units of production:

Units Materials Conversion

Units transferred to the next 9,900 9,900 (100%) 9,900 (100%)

Ending work in process 3,400 3,060 (90%) 1,020 (30%)

Equivalent units of production 12,960 10,920

Costs of production: Materials Conversion

Beginning work in process $14,400 $6,500

Costs added during the month 173,500 243,500

Total costs of production $187,900 $250,000

Cost per equivalent unit: Materials Conversion

Total costs of production $187,900 $250,000

Equivalent units of production 12,960 10,920

Cost per equivalent unit $14.50 $22.89

7 0

3 years ago