The difference is due to the dose and the purpose of the radiation.
<h3>What is radiology?</h3>
Radiology is the application of radiation in medicine to diagnose or to treat diseases.
Diagnosis of diseases is aimed at identifying the cause of a disease.
Treatment of diseases is aimed at curative purposes.
Therefore, one patient will have a radiologic procedure to diagnose a condition because the cause of the disease is yet to be ascertained, while another has radiation treatment to destroy a tumor because radiation can destroy tumors at a particular dose.
In conclusion, radiation can be use to diagnose or treat diseases based on the dose.
Learn more about radiology at: brainly.com/question/24653135
#SPJ1
I hope it's an open question, since I can not find the statements.
The monitoring mechanisms are in addition to the regulation of the succession of the four phases of the cycle by the Cdk. They allow the monitoring of fundamental aspects such as the state of the DNA molecules before, during and after their replication (DDCP = DNA Damage Checkpoint), the total completion of the replication before the entry into mitosis (RCP = Replication Checkpoint ) and the correct positioning of all chromosomes on the metaphase plate before sister chromatid separation (MPC = Mitotic Checkpoint).
Disruption of the cell cycle leads either to cell death because the cell can no longer continue its cycle, in the worst case to anarchic proliferation. The major interest of the study of the regulation of the cell cycle and its points of surveillance lies in the fact that these processes are often unregulated in cancers. Knowing the regulation of the cell cycle is therefore fundamental for oncology and can be used to develop new therapeutic approaches.
I know that you can think of some thing.
<span>Fossil evidence helped prove the theory of continental drift because similar fossils could be found on separate continents, in rocks of roughly the same age, surrounded by layers that matched each other, and in some cases, found nowhere else in the world.
Examples include Mesosaurus and Lystrosaurus. Both are reptiles found in places now separated by oceans. Neither could have swum such great lengths across salt water.
Another example includes the plant Glossopteris, a fernlike plant from about 250 million years ago. That plant has been found in small areas in Africa, South America, Australia, India, and Antarctica, all in small sections that lined up in Alfred Wegener's (the guy who developed the theory of continental drift) view of the supercontinent Pangaea. It should be note that those other fossils also lined up too. Glossopteris has a seedlike structure to it that was too large to be carried such great distances by wind and not strong enough (too fragile) to survive a trip by water. You ask what about birds? That's quite a distance for a bird to travel while carrying a large seed.
All of this together, along with evidence from landforms that matched up just like the fossils, and evidence from climate helped convince Wegener that continental drift had happened.
</span>
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. The afferent division descends with sensory information. <span>The </span>afferent division<span> refers to sensory signals that travel away from the stimulus. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
