1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
3 years ago
15

How did Americans disagree over the role of the federal government before and during the Civil War?

History
2 answers:
vodka [1.7K]3 years ago
7 0
States and rights was a very large factor contributing to the Civil War. With Lincoln becoming president and representing the North, the Southern states seceded, leading to a war. The state governments of the South argued, since the constitution and federal government was created by the states, the federal government had no right to stop from seceding. President Lincoln and other northerners disagreed and wanted to preserve the Union. 
Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:  States and rights was a very large factor contributing to the Civil War. With Lincoln becoming president and representing the North, the Southern states seceded, leading to a war. The state governments of the South argued, since the constitution and federal government was created by the states, the federal government had no right to stop from seceding. President Lincoln and other northerners disagreed and wanted to preserve the Union. 

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Should Eisenhower have fought with the germans first why or why not?
Phantasy [73]

Answer:

This long-awaited and decisive attack ultimately led to the defeat of Nazi Germany. By the end of the war, Eisenhower had become a five-star general the highest U.S. military rank. Eisenhower's leadership during World War II made him a national hero.

6 0
2 years ago
How many people had to live in a territory before it could apply for statehood ?
goldenfox [79]
I believe that the answer is sixty thousand people. Hope this helped :)
5 0
3 years ago
What was the primary economic strain in the early days after the end of world war 2
borishaifa [10]
If you can please Provide answer Choices but other than that, I would think at the end of WW2 we had issues cleaning up the Radiation of the bombing in Japan and dealing with how to help the Jews that were captured and kept in encampments.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is a Republic an autocracy
Paul [167]

Answer: In the context of American constitutional law, the definition of republic refers specifically to a form of government in which elected individuals represent the citizen body and exercise power according to the rule of law under a constitution, including separation of powers with an elected head of state.

8 0
3 years ago
The Marshall Plan and the creation of NATO both...
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

D. Created a strong alliance between the US and Western European countries.

Explanation:

The Marshall Plan was a way for the US to provide aid to Western Europe in 1948 after the conclusion of WW2. WW2 left Europe in ruins, while the US, due to its geopolitical location, was left relatively unscathed on its home front. Through this plan, the US was ultimately able to provide billions of dollars in aid to Western Europe.

On the other hand, NATO stands for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and it was a mutual defense pact formed by the US and its allies. NATO included the US, Canada, and 10 Western European countries. With NATO, these countries essentially pledged to defend each other under attack and to collectively work towards their mutual safety and security.

Therefore, both NATO and the Marshall Plan strengthened the US's ties to Western Europe, making the answer D correct.

<u>We can also analyze the other answer choices to see why they're incorrect:</u>

Option A is incorrect because the Marshall Plan has nothing to do with the Korean War, it was simply a way to provide aid to Europe. Moreover, the Korean War was primarily between North Korea and South Korea, as a proxy war during the Cold War. Not all NATO countries were involved, and the US wasn't defending their own security, rather they were fighting Communism in Asia.

Option B is incorrect because the Marshall Plan provided huge sums of economic aid that only made rebuilding Europe easier.

Option C is incorrect because NATO only increased tensions. Not only did NATO mean that the US could station weapons in its member states (meaning weapons in closer proximity to the Soviet Union's territory) but it also made tensions impossible to deny. The Soviet Union and its allies would respond in 1955 with their own pact known as the Warsaw Treaty Organization.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A benefit of using good human relations is that you will
    12·1 answer
  • Japanese Americans were forced to relocate to guard camps because they were becoming successful business people true or false
    11·2 answers
  • What is similar about why congress and the courts informally change the constitution? How do their methods changing the constitu
    13·1 answer
  • How are the governments of Australia and New Zealand similar to and different from that of the United Stated?
    8·1 answer
  • Although buying a Certificate of Deposit can earn your higher returns than a regular savings account, it can have the negative s
    10·2 answers
  • Why were Southerners worried by the outcome of the Nullification Crisis? If tariffs stayed low, it would hurt the Southern econo
    13·1 answer
  • On May 1, 1930, President Herbert Hoover addressed the annual dinner of the United States Chamber of Commerce.
    13·2 answers
  • Interested in society as a whole, believed sociologist should go beyond
    6·1 answer
  • Identify the definition of inflation
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!