1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
10

What is the difference between forms and systems of government

History
1 answer:
ololo11 [35]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A form of government is like democracy Monarchy and so forth, a system of government is how it actually runs like america legislative branch, judicial, and executive

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why were Neolithic pots better than earlier pots?
Leto [7]

Answer:

they were handmade

Explanation:

they were one of the first handmade pots so it would be (d)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast George O'Keeffe and Jacob Lawrence.
jasenka [17]
George O'Keefe's George O'Keefe's
Compares with Jacob Lawrence Contrast with Jacob Lawrence
.They both had siblings .They both were born on different dates
.They are both artist .He was a man and one was white
.They both got married .He was black and she was a woman


. .
7 0
3 years ago
Siddhartha Gautama founded Buddhism in because he
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

He decided to give up his lavish lifestyle and endure poverty. When this didn't fulfill him, he promoted the idea of the “Middle Way,” which means existing between two extremes. Thus, he sought a life without social indulgences but also without deprivation

6 0
3 years ago
What argument did La Follette use to show that primary elections are the foundation of government in a republic?
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

La Follette defended that in a republic citizens have the right to elect their representative by voting on them. Because of that, he said that citizens should be allowed to control all stages of the elections, including the primaries.


3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is characteristic of the Monroe Doctrine?
ser-zykov [4K]
The correct statement is "forbade European intervention in the Western Hemisphere."

The Monroe Doctrine was aimed at separating the world into the Eastern and Western Hemispheres. In this case, the US did not want any European influence in the Western part of the world, especially in the Latin American countries. The US argued that these countries, such as Brazil, Chile, and Bolivia, were under the "sphere of influence" from the US.

Even though the US did not want European countries to interfere with countries in this hemisphere, they had no intention of taking over any colonies established before this doctrine. This meant that the Europeans who already controlled areas in the Western Hemisphere did not have to worry about a US invasion of any sort.
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the cause of the panic of 1837
    11·1 answer
  • The problem of .... was targeted by the Office of Price Administration.
    13·1 answer
  • In the honest table Ramona salvarez case; recent case-ruled that a social media website analyzing its users’ profile information
    13·1 answer
  • how did john locke influence the writers of the french declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen
    15·1 answer
  • Which answer puts these Revolutionary Period events in the correct order?
    14·2 answers
  • Help guys help !!! !!
    9·2 answers
  • Why did supporters of using the atomic bomb reject the idea of dropping one on a deserted island? They thought the radioactive f
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following did Americans expect after the Revolutionary War? A. The Articles of Confederation would be revised. B. A
    15·2 answers
  • List and describe how tension between the US and USSR came out during and after world war II
    7·1 answer
  • Why was there tension in europe prior to ww1
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!