Most likely, you've learned in science classes that atoms are the building blocks of matter. You've probably also learned that a
toms are made up of subatomic particles: protons, electrons, and neutrons. What you may not know, however, is that scientists have discovered particles that are even smaller than subatomic particles. This discovery was made through the use of particle colliders, or atom smashers. Atom smashers take subatomic particles and accelerate them to a speed that is faster than the speed of sound and almost as fast as the speed of light. When atoms moving at this speed smash into one another, they break apart into their internal components. Scientists study these incredibly small parts to better understand the fundamental structure of matter. Through this study, scientists hope to gain insight into the biggest mystery of them all: the origin of the universe!
Which statement is the best thesis for this passage?
A.
Subatomic particles break into their internal components when they collide at high speeds.
B.
Knowledge gained from the atom smashers will unlock the mystery of the universe's origin.
C.
Scientists have discovered the origin of the universe by smashing atoms together.
D.
Atom smashers accelerate the movement of electrons, protons, and neutrons.
B. Knowledge gained from atom smashers will unlock the mystery of the Universe's origin.
Explanation:
In this passage, the author writes begins with a recapitulation of the components of atoms, mentioning the subatomic particles. Then, mentions there are particles that are even smaller that these and were discovered with the help of atom smashers. Moreover, how atoms smashers work is explained and the implication of impact of these particle colliders to understand the origins of the universe.
In summary, <u>it highlights the impact of the study of atom smashers which is directed to the discovery and understanding of the origins of the universe. Option A is not sufficient as it doesn't mention the purpose of the study, C is incorrect because scientists have not discovered it yet, and D is also insufficient because it only mentions how atom smashers work. Therefore, it would be B.</u>
The correct answer is 4) A logical appeal based on facts and reason.
An argument has to be based on facts which are correct - you shouldn't base your argument on incorrect information because then you will look stupid. Also, you should apply reason why forming an argument in order to make it sound sane and plausible for everyone to understand and perhaps agree with you.
Troy believes the lottery to be foolish because there is such a slim chance of winning that there is no point in it. This shows he is a cautious person and isn't gullible.
