1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
4 years ago
9

Why does Harriet Robinson note that it is “hardly necessary to say” that the 1836 Lowell strike failed to improve conditions in

the mills? a. It is hardly necessary to say that so far as results were concerned this strike did no good. b. The dissatisfaction of the operatives subsided, or burned itself out, and though the authorities did not accede to their demands, the majority returned to their work, and the corporation went on cutting down the wages.
History
1 answer:
alisha [4.7K]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

b. The dissatisfaction of the operatives subsided, or burned itself out, and though the authorities did not accede to their demands, the majority returned to their work, and the corporation went on cutting down the wages.

Explanation:

The Lowell Mill Strike happened in October 1836 in a cotton-factory. The main reason for the strike was the cut down of the wages, all of the girl went into a strike demanding that the wages were not cut down. 

The strike did not have a good result, the authorities did not follow the demands and continued to cut down the wages. The wages became more and more reduced and workers did not have any other choice. Some got back to work and others left and went to their homes. 

You might be interested in
Why did the founding fathers focused heavily on unalienable rights being guaranteed by the U.S. government
olasank [31]
After overthrowing the rule of a tyrannical government, it’s easy to see why the founding fathers wanted to ensure that the citizens would have rights that could not be taken away from them: they wanted to ensure that the people of the United States of America would never be subjected to such tyranny ever again.
8 0
3 years ago
22.
tino4ka555 [31]
I’m not sure. What I do know is (PACS) is an abbreviation for Polital Action Committees.
6 0
3 years ago
ANALIZO LA CONVIVENCIA ARMÓNICA DE LA ANTIGÜEDAD CON LA SOCIEDAD ACTUAL Y COMPLETO EL SIGUIENTE CUADRO
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.

Desafortunadamente, se te olvidó incluir el cuadro.

A pesar de que se te olvidó anexar ese cuadro, lo que podemos hacer para ayudarte a responder esta pregunta, es compartirte la siguiente información para que puedas elaborar tu cuadro.

La convivencia armónica de la antigüedad era muy distinta a la convivencia de la actualidad.

En la antigüedad, el núcleo familiar era más sólido y se convivía mucho tiempo entre los integrantes de una familia. Era tiempos en los que la tecnología no existía y todo el tiempo se le dedicaba al trabajo. Las condiciones económicas no eran favorables como para andar perdiendo el tiempo. Los momentos de descanso se aprovechaban para fomentar la convivencia familiar y el convivio con otras familias en lugares sociales o en la iglesia.

Era una época en donde la interacción personal directa era muy importante y valorada.

La convivencia moderna de nuestros días es fría, y cada vez se enfría más debido al excesivo uso de la tecnología que cada vez está separando más a las familias y a los amigos.

Hoy en día es triste ver como en una reunión en casa o en un restaurante, cada persona está inmerso en su teléfono celular, apartándose completamente de la relación interpersonal directa.  

8 0
3 years ago
Why is the Vietnam War an example of a proxy war?
julsineya [31]

Answer:

The correct answer is B) China and the Soviet Union supported North Vietnam, while the United States backed South Vietnam, even though the US wasn't directly at war with China or the United States.

That is why the Vietnam War is an example of a proxy war.

When an armed conflict was instigated by two countries that do not directly fight each other, we have a proxy war. Those two major countries use third countries to fight against each other. That was the case of the Vietnam War. During the Cold War years, the Soviet Union wanted to spread Communism in many nations, such as Vietnam. That is why the USSR supported North Vietnam. On the opposite side, the United States wanted to stop the spread of Communism, and that is why it supported South Vietnam.

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
9.  Of the three types of independent agencies, which one operates much like a private business? (1 point)
antiseptic1488 [7]
The answer is the 3rd one
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which late 19th century industry would have the greatest impact on the 20th and 21st centuries
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is characteristic of how Elizabeth I felt about Separatists?
    12·1 answer
  • The President of the United States must undergo a serious surgery, and may be incapacitated for a week. Which of the following c
    8·1 answer
  • How did increased contact with other parts of the world affect the slave trade in Africa?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the transcontinental railroad route across indian territory ruled out?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following leaders used terror, determination, and vision to reach his goals, even at the cost of millions of Soviet
    13·2 answers
  • Here’s my question lol
    15·1 answer
  • The 1850 organic act of the territory of new mexico accomplished all of the following except
    5·2 answers
  • What were the effects of European Imperialism on Africa?
    13·1 answer
  • In the 1840s and 1850s, the United States witnessed the realignment of its long-standing two-party system. Why did the old syste
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!