Hmm. maybe start of with something like "What is laughter? " Then write a definition for it and do a story about someone who's never experienced "laughter" and they are trapped in their own little 'bubble'not understanding what all the excitement is all about. I hope this helped.
The answer would most likely be:
<u><em>The play we are about to read will fill in the details of this story.</em></u>
*** The choices:
---What is lacking in this description is lacking in our play.
---This prologue does not disclose all the juicy details of the story.
---The play we are about to read will fill in the details of this story.
---A prologue is merely an introduction; it cannot tell the whole story.
If we were to translate this into modern text the line basically says that what was not shown in the prologue will be shown in the play. Among the choices, it is the best translation of what the line meant.
The correct answer is that the implications were important and widespread.
The Supreme Court can take a case if it is deemed important for the United States as a whole. Supreme Court as the highest legal body in the United States has that right. They exercised in a number of instances throughout history. The issue of segregation that was the core of Brown v Board of Education was one such case.
Japanese needs to be capitalized since it's representing a group of people/race
