Answer:
A). Nativist; Empiricist.
Explanation:
A nativist view proposes the claim that the 'perceptual development' of humans is highly inflated by the nature. Such <u>a view asserts that humans are born with certain intrinsic ability or skill to develop or learn a language/speech.</u> While the 'empiricist' perspective promotes the idea that human beings and their perceptual developments are more influenced by the external/environmental factors which include a major contribution of <u>'learning and experiences'</u>. Therefore, the former one encourages the role of 'nature' while the latter promotes the part played by 'nurture' in shaping an individual's 'intuitive/perceptual' development.
I don't know the answer! no More explaination haha
He set a giant boulder at the mouth of the cave.
Answer:
D. All I can say about my rival's idea is that he's a thief and he should be ignored.
Explanation:
Ad Hominem is a Latin word that means "against the man".
This particular fallacy of ad hominem is simply the act of going against sound logic when making an argument to make personal attacks on the speaker.
From the example above, there was a personal attack on the rival against his idea while bringing up the matter that he was a thief and should be ignored.
This is a very good example of Ad Hominem fallacy because he threw away sound logic while making his argument and instead chose personal attacks against his rival to score cheap points.
I believe your answer would be horseback.
Hope this helps!
